Hatem Ben Arfa
New member
If he never went off injured, I'm sure it would have been a Manita against Madrid.
let's not rush him back and give him a 4 week break to recover.
let's not rush him back and give him a 4 week break to recover.
If he never went off injured, I'm sure it would have been a Manita against Madrid.
let's not rush him back and give him a 4 week break to recover.
people say barca without messi would struggle blah blah... but i think barca without iniesta is the real problem
It's OK because when Pep retires as Barca coach then Maria can take over...
If he never went off injured, I'm sure it would have been a Manita against Madrid.
let's not rush him back and give him a 4 week break to recover.
I thought that this is a forum where the majority of the posters are aware of the fact that a victory or a loss in football depends of much more than one player..if you disagree with me, you are more than welcome to bring arguments(and not just "girls don't know about football")..
Yes..because we saw in Bernabeu how efficient is Iniesta in front of goal..we were also playing very good before he went out..
We played better than RM from 30'-60'..after Cristiano scored, it's like our players didn't know what to do anymore..
And I didn't hear any of the madridistas saying that they would have qualified if Di Maria(who has been until January their second best player) wouldn't have been injured.
Scholes (Man United): "Best three opponents? Xavi, Iniesta and Zidane."
Zidane at his best was incredible, utterly majestic.What is Zidane doing there?
Zidane at his best was incredible, utterly majestic.
Pity he was at his best maybe 3 games a year.