Trophies or lack thereof aside, Carlo's Madrid played some dangerously good attacking football on the pitch. One of two teams that has ever inspired fear in me (the other being Heynckes' Bayern in 12/13). Even in their lowest moments and our best one (the Clasico this march), they outplayed us in the first half and gave a very fierce contest. The only team in recent history (past 3-4 years) with a greater goalscoring momentum is the Barca team of these past 5 months. In a season deemed as a failure they've scored more goals than anyone in Europe and average 7.4 shots on target per game. That's a testament to how good Ancelotti's team was. This is all aside from the fact that he was also brilliant in the administrative aspect of things, making the Galacticos act as motivated professionals immediately after the Moudrid circus and gaining the love of pretty much all of his players (except maybe Khedira
).
Rafa may not be a total clown but I'd feel a hell of a lot better with him in Ancelotti's place. Can he really replicate the versatility that Ancelotti's side had with the 4-3-3/4-4-2 variations at will? Does he have the potential to make them as dominant of an attacking force as the side that put 5 past Neuer last season with little trouble? I very much doubt it. Carlo did a spectacular job with RM's footballing style and capacity, which I'm glad we likely won't see again with Benitez. Them winning 0 trophies this season was largely due to circumstance and Barca's abnormal rise, the only managerial flaw being a lack of some rotation.