F
FCBSAM
Guest
Messi is da best, we are positive thinking CULERS and we shall yet prove it once more. by the way, why was Ronaldo getting an attitude when he was replaced yesterday?
Point is if you were to miss those 5 players you would cope much better than us.
We simply dont have quality subs like you do.
Didnt want to be subbed. To be honest alot was made of it but it shouldnt have been.Messi is da best, we are positive thinking CULERS and we shall yet prove it once more. by the way, why was Ronaldo getting an attitude when he was replaced yesterday?
ya you are right its not his experience.but we should blame pep in his subs. i know hleb hasnt performed well all season long but what about caceres? while he had been poor in few games but also was brilliant in few others, n as LB too. the subs too need time to show what they can do. if pep does same to bojan next year i'm sure he will be willing to leave(on loan at least).Guys it`s not the lack of Pep`s experience (although he is late with the subs sometimes). It`s the lack of depth. Pep was dealt the same/weaker cards than Rijkaard had.
Just look at what Txiki bought for almost 40 mil. Hleb and Caceres. Both players that are used less than Pedro and Vasquez (both youth players for you Mancs here).
There simply isn`t enough cover, especially for Xavi and Iniesta.
What do you classify as influential? Making all the actions and trying to provide team mates with scoring opportunities throughout the whole match, eight games in a row?@ maz
I admit that I don't follow the La Liga as much as I'd like to. However I tend not to miss the high profile games. So my view about Iniesta might not be as accurate as yours. Anyway I still think that Ronaldo is far more influential than Iniesta.
Also, Ronaldo is still nowhere near his best. In the Manchester derby, although he scored from a free kick (deflected) he was anonymous throughout the game.
Well perhaps the iniesta/ronaldo comparison is debatable. But as for henry, given that he was our most important player before xmas when we played sevilla, valencia, madrid, villarreal, and then had scored 4 goals in 3 games against sevilla, valencia, madrid, and should have had a penalty against chelsea, i would put him above tévez and berbs.@ maz
I admit that I don't follow the La Liga as much as I'd like to. However I tend not to miss the high profile games. So my view about Iniesta might not be as accurate as yours. Anyway I still think that Ronaldo is far more influential than Iniesta.
Also, Ronaldo is still nowhere near his best. In the Manchester derby, although he scored from a free kick (deflected) he was anonymous throughout the game.
I'm not sure who I'd compare Henry with. We do not have a quality left winger that can be compared with Henry. Position wise, he can be compared to Rooney or Park depending on who plays in the left wing. Influence wise, I'd put him below the likes of Rooney and Ronaldo but above Tevez and Berbatov.
I love you Gio!marca is reporting that iniesta will be back for the cl final
I never loved Marca so much before.Marca is reporting that Iniesta will be back for the CL final
Marca is reporting that Iniesta will be back for the CL final
Well perhaps the iniesta/ronaldo comparison is debatable. But as for henry, given that he was our most important player before xmas when we played sevilla, valencia, madrid, villarreal, and then had scored 4 goals in 3 games against sevilla, valencia, madrid, and should have had a penalty against chelsea, i would put him above tévez and berbs.
I'd put him below the likes of Rooney and Ronaldo but above Tevez and Berbatov.
I never loved Marca so much before.
Although wouldnt it be interesting that the madrid paper is giving culés false hope!