Stric
New member
If Lahm is not playing as a RB, how can he be a better RB than actual RBs?
Because if he was playing RB, he would possibly be better than some other RB? It's not an assumption, it's based on previous performances. He has played a large part of his career there, so I don't see why anyone should ignore that. There's more than sufficient info on which one can base an assessment about Lahm as a RB.
That's like saying Mascherano cannot be a better DM than some other DM, simply because he plays CB at the moment, or most of the time.
Last edited: