Luftstalag14
Culé de Celestial Empire
I never said it's wrong, I said ironic, because you're posting dribbling stats to show how well he did, but when the same dribbling stats are used to show that another player is twice as efficient, you talk about subjectiveness not captured in the stats.
You are still not getting the point. The point is, player A can have 10 dribbles in a game and player B can have another 10 dribbles in a game, does that mean all 10 dribbles are equal? If I make 10 dribbles in my amateur league game and Messi only made 5, does that mean I am better than Messi in terms of dribbling? Of course, that is just an outrageous example, EPL and La Liga are comparable leagues. The point is not all dribbles are equal, even in the same league, same game. The stats alone do not tell the story when you compare two players. However, they are pretty indicative in terms of showing how a player did in a game.
l didn't imply my eye-test was better than everybody else's, in fact I implied in my first paragraph that the eye test/subjective outlook is only useful if the stats were somewhat comparable to each other, which they're not.
You lost me there. Again, I do not disagree with your opinion/assessment to a certain degree, however I do not agree with you that stats are indicative enough to compare two players.