And I've said already that EV isn't the coach for Barca next year, just like I talked about other coaches
And the last part shows that you don't even bother to try to read what I said before (but bothers to reply for some reason) as I talked always about those problems will always be persistent with any other coaches, it will be here after EV and those are thing I want to change.
This isn't excuse for Ernesto, you want to look it this way it is your problem not mine.
Lucho was good for 2 seasons, the second season we were actually playing better football that 1st except that month after international break were fatigue destroyed the team, as we had many older player in SA and didn't have enough rotations and thin squad thanks to transfer ban.
I would take treble and double and one of our best ever football in those 2 seasons and thanks the coach.
Don't remember calling him Brillianto Valverde, may be after classico? Probably but it was joking more or less, like many says Goatverde after such games.
And again, I never rated EV that high, but I said that for current circumstances and with squad in hand I don't think we will do much better, this squad isn't built for entertaining + results, nor for being serious CL contender.
And I doubt the board will go for a coach ready to make change after EV, won't be surprised if Blanc and Eusebio are the top candidates for us.
Well, you can actually make an argument whether Messi isn't stubborn if you want, you can argue he isn't a tactical challenge too if you want. But nah, it is easier to call out members and just say their opinion is nonsense rather than presenting a counter argument
Haha, khaled oh khaled, you ain't fooling me. I think you didnt grasp my point, I'll keep it short. People know you for a reason, they aren't dumb, as [MENTION=20420]God Serena[/MENTION] mentioned you as a poster here. Yes, you mentioned EV as a poor coach a couple of times, but like I said what's so interesting about you is that you contradict yourself almost immediately and try to downplay other coaches so that you can defend him in every ways possible.
Some examples: "Valverde is a midtable coach but... *insert bullshit reasons then ultimately don't relate discussions about coaches themselves*." You'll always try to skew away from the main discussion, and push blame/attention to others like... Roma 3rd best team huh? Directors didnt give Ernie a better squad? Even blame rotations on the board?
But when others present their point as "Yes, Koeman is not as good but... or he is better than Ev because..." Straightaway,
you shoot them down directly with " because Koeman is a midtable coach, he wont suit Barca". In this case you don't evade the main topic because EV is not the focal point here.
See the contradiction here?
I didn't say the individual points you brought were all wrong in any way, but the way you contradict yourself and try to cloud the main topic. If by saying one player, Messi, says this or says that, AND therefore he automatically becomes the "BEST" manager without any concrete points to back that up, isn't a terribly flawed argument, I don't know what is. I actually like how you also say Lucho is a world class coach just because of a treble, and double but go ahead and contradict yourself again by saying Rijkaard is the best because Messi said so. Worst, Messi never implied it that way, only the coach who impacted him the most in his individual career.
But hey, whatever rocks your boat.
