Take loan from Goldman Sachs. But have problem with sponsorship from Vegan Company in Israel.
I am not disputing whatever you are saying about what the Israeli government has done or is doing, what I am saying again and again is that regular individuals and business entities have nothing to do with the state. Not just in authoritarian states, even in the democratic countries individuals and entities should not be held responsible for what the government has done, even though they can influence them (in theory).
Sanctions and embargoes have been carried out in a wholesale and unjust way against everybody and entity in a country, true, for example Iran and that sucks, it should have never been done this way. There are increasingly more targeted sanctions though these days, for example US sanctions against certain Chinese companies and government officials that were believed to be complicit of certain things the Chinese government is accused of by the US. That?s better than sanctioning an entire country. Anyways, the point is you have to separate normal citizens and business entities from the state and not hold them liable for what their government has done. I don?t know where you are from, should you or businesses from your country be boycotted simply because they are from your country because of grievances against your government? No.
Just because they are Israeli, we should boycott it? Ridiculous.
Take loan from Goldman Sachs. But have problem with sponsorship from Vegan Company in Israel.
I understand your points well and they have some merit but this isn't like other countries in modern history.
Analogy. I kick you out of your own home and then I let my friend stay in your house working your land. My friend knows I stole the house and the land and am keeping you locked up in your own basement while not providing you with enough food or water.
On the occasions I do give you food if you attempt to hit me with a paper plane I punish you by savagely beating the entirely of your body with a whip.
Is my friend complicit by accepting to stay there knowing full well the land and house were stolen and I'm regularly abusing you?
Let's just agree to Disagree.
Palestinian HAMAS, a recognized terrorist organization, is responsible for feeding and providing its population with necessities, not Israel. Instead of teaming up with Iran, another leading terrorist sponsor, and trying to kill as many Israeli civilians as possible, perhaps those resources could have gone to its people to buy water and electricity, as you mentioned above.
What if they are Israeli muslims though?
I understand your points well and they have some merit but this isn't like other countries in modern history.
Analogy. I kick you out of your own home and then I let my friend stay in your house working your land. My friend knows I stole the house and the land and am keeping you locked up in your own basement while not providing you with enough food or water.
On the occasions I do give you food if you attempt to hit me with a paper plane I punish you by savagely beating the entirely of your body with a whip.
Is my friend complicit by accepting to stay there knowing full well the land and house were stolen and I'm regularly abusing you?
Let's just agree to Disagree.