Obviously, which is the whole reason we ain't rushing him back. He has had one injury during his time with us and even though Steab loves to claim the madrid doctors were so good they saw his injury coming 5 years ago its doubtful. Knee injuries are troublesome and we don't want to rush him back as Villarreal did with Gonzalo only for it to reoccur. We have had specialists with him throughout the process and we have left it with them. I doubt they'll rush him back.
We shouldn't sell a player just because of one injury tbh.
it's not a claim it's a fact... that's the reason why they didn't sign Milito couple of years ago.. he is a great player & its good that he survived all this but having a cracked knee is a fact not a claim..
Beast what do u mean "iin gonzalo case its the first time"? He has had two knee injuries hasnt he? Unless i misunderstand what youre saying.
Beast what do u mean "iin gonzalo case its the first time"? He has had two knee injuries hasnt he? Unless i misunderstand what youre saying.
Wasn't a setback at all Beast. He was declared fit, placed into a game and fell down with a fresh injury to the same ligament. If anything it was worse than Milito, two injuries to the same ligament in quick succession, as opposed to being a fairly big time gap for Milito.
I think he had been rehabilitated 100% (or at least as much as one CAN be rehabilited after cruciate ligament damage). It wasnt a few weeks after...i think it was at least 2 or 3 months after he had returned to full fitness. Iim no doctor but from what i hear, after cruciate ligament damage your ligament never returns to the way it was before. So some people get injured a month later, some a year later, some never. But there is always more risk of it being injured. Therefore gonzalo and milito are in the same boat in my opinion.just one and setback in the recovery if i remember correctly not an entire new one couple of years later like Milito