True, however at some point you hit a saturation limit. Nothing grows eternily. If Valencia could manage to sign someone like Beckham or Ronaldinho it might help them to attract more people to the stadium, attract more viewers on TV, get better commercial deals, negotiate a better TV contract and whatnot. If Real Madrid sign Bale then ... yeah ... then what? lol
Well, that's why I'm not against clubs like PSG or Chelsea.
Because it was a complete statu quo.
- Rich and popular clubs stayed rich and popular
- Small or poor clubs had no means to go higher.
To get your clubs bigger, you need money and great players.
- If you find a great player, you lose him because a rich club wants him.
- Feeding a diamond is rare, so...
- Small clubs can't do much with 30-40 millions euros.
--------------
People should change their view on PSG and co. because
- Fresh clubs appeared.
- They are strong and rich enough to make leagues a lot more interesting instead of only seeing Madrid and co. every year.
- They INJECT a lot of money in the market.
- Many smaller clubs get better from that money. Example : NAPOLI.
I don't say PSG and Chelsea are great clubs. But i PERSONALLY think that now the CL and many leagues (the french league for example) are way more interesting now.
I don't care what CLUB's president like perez are saying about rich clubs like PSG. As a common person, I like how, for example, the PL got more interesting IMO since new rich clubs appeared.