Hans-Dieter Flick

Hansi Flick - how do we rate him?


  • Total voters
    112

RedxMAK

Active member
You should know every time you bring up numbers, you should cite a source
OR you are pulling the numbers out of your arse (nothing personal, general rule)

Let's see if what you write has any truth in it:

1/10/22: Mallorca - Barca 0-1, xG: 1.16 - 0.73, Big chances: 1-0
3 pts INSTEAD of 0pts

9/10/22: Barca - Celta 1-0, xG: 1.16 - 0.73, Big chances: 2-2
3pts INSTEAD of 1 pt

8/1/23: Atleti - Barca 0-1, xG: 1.84 - 0.66, Big chances: 2-2
3pts INSTEAD of 1 pt

22/1/23: Barca - Getafe 1-0, xG: 0.73 - 1.08 , Big chances: 1-4
3 pts INSTEAD of 0 pts

28/1/23: Girona - Barca 0-1:, xG: 1.06 - 1.1, Big chances: 2-1
3 pts INSTEAD of 0 pts

12/3/23: Bilbao - Barca 0-1: xG: 0.87 - 0.9, Big changes 2-1
3 pts INSTEAD of 0 pts

10/4/23: Barca - Girona 0-0: xG: 1.31 - 0.6, Big chances 0-1
1pt INSTEAD of 0 pts

(I stopped looking after the date we clinched the title mathematically)
Source: Fotmob

So, in all these games we got UNDESERVED points, because of luck and Stegen.
in particular we got 19 pts instead of the 2 pts we deserved based on our performance.

So Xavi was gifted by luck and Stegen 17 more points than what he prepared his team for.
And I am not even talking the terrorist football we were forced to watch those months.
I am only talking results based on chances here

PS: By contrast, Flick had lower Big chances than the opponent in 5 games this season in all comps:
Monaco, Osasuna, Celta, Betis, Sociedad (2 of them because of the RED cards)
which we ALL lost

On the other hand, we got robbed by luck and our attackers in 3 games already: Las Palmas, and the two infamous ones against Leganes and Atleti
My source was also FotMob. Like I said there’s no way they were all luck. There’s a good thing they absorbed that pressure and took their chances. You don’t win a league title entirely based on luck that’s not how it works. Barcelona were the best team in Spain that year and nothing is gonna convince me otherwise.
 

RedxMAK

Active member
You should know every time you bring up numbers, you should cite a source
OR you are pulling the numbers out of your arse (nothing personal, general rule)

Let's see if what you write has any truth in it:

1/10/22: Mallorca - Barca 0-1, xG: 1.16 - 0.73, Big chances: 1-0
3 pts INSTEAD of 0pts

9/10/22: Barca - Celta 1-0, xG: 1.16 - 0.73, Big chances: 2-2
3pts INSTEAD of 1 pt

8/1/23: Atleti - Barca 0-1, xG: 1.84 - 0.66, Big chances: 2-2
3pts INSTEAD of 1 pt

22/1/23: Barca - Getafe 1-0, xG: 0.73 - 1.08 , Big chances: 1-4
3 pts INSTEAD of 0 pts

28/1/23: Girona - Barca 0-1:, xG: 1.06 - 1.1, Big chances: 2-1
3 pts INSTEAD of 0 pts

12/3/23: Bilbao - Barca 0-1: xG: 0.87 - 0.9, Big changes 2-1
3 pts INSTEAD of 0 pts

10/4/23: Barca - Girona 0-0: xG: 1.31 - 0.6, Big chances 0-1
1pt INSTEAD of 0 pts

(I stopped looking after the date we clinched the title mathematically)
Source: Fotmob

So, in all these games we got UNDESERVED points, because of luck and Stegen.
in particular we got 19 pts instead of the 2 pts we deserved based on our performance.

So Xavi was gifted by luck and Stegen 17 more points than what he prepared his team for.
And I am not even talking the terrorist football we were forced to watch those months.
I am only talking results based on chances here

PS: By contrast, Flick had lower Big chances than the opponent in 5 games this season in all comps:
Monaco, Osasuna, Celta, Betis, Sociedad (2 of them because of the RED cards)
which we ALL lost

On the other hand, we got robbed by luck and our attackers in 3 games already: Las Palmas, and the two infamous ones against Leganes and Atleti
Another thing I said, in Barcelona the winning comes before the performance. When the performance isn’t good, you still need to win. How do you think Barcelona won the 17-18 and 18-19 LLiga titles.
 

Birdy

Senior Member
My source was also FotMob. Like I said there’s no way they were all luck. There’s a good thing they absorbed that pressure and took their chances. You don’t win a league title entirely based on luck that’s not how it works. Barcelona were the best team in Spain that year and nothing is gonna convince me otherwise.

That's your answer? :lol:

Dude, I wasted a good amount of my time to write for you line by line ALL the games we got undeserved points.
17 more points than what we should have

It's not bad to make a mistake
Just admit it and stop embarrassing yourself with generalities when getting cornered
 

RedxMAK

Active member
That's your answer? :lol:

Dude, I wasted a good amount of my time to write for you line by line ALL the games we got undeserved points.
17 more points than what we should have

It's not bad to make a mistake
Just admit it and stop embarrassing yourself with generalities when getting cornered
Statistics are not always anything and do not always show the entire picture. Like what Maradona37 said, you shouldn’t rely on them to show how good a team played in a game. If that were the case, Real Madrid’s win over us in last October’s El Clasico was undeserved as we had more xG and the same amount of big chances. But no, we deserved to lose because of us giving them too much respect in the second half. Just cause there’s a slight difference in big chances and xG, doesn’t prove anything to how the game was played. Like I said, in Barcelona, the winning comes first, when your performance can’t be good enough to win your way, you have to win eitherway. We are not Dortmund or Arsenal to be happy playing well and losing. There’s no shame in playing badly and winning.
 

RedxMAK

Active member
That's your answer? :lol:

Dude, I wasted a good amount of my time to write for you line by line ALL the games we got undeserved points.
17 more points than what we should have

It's not bad to make a mistake
Just admit it and stop embarrassing yourself with generalities when getting cornered
At the end of the day, yes Flick’s Barcelona could be playing football 1000x times better than Xavi. But if it comes to nothing, not even a Copa Del Rey. It won’t be of value to most of the fanbase. And it would mean the apparently ‘lucky’ 22-23 Liga would have more value than what we achieved this season. It’s about the trophies at the end of the season.
 

ajnotkeith

Senior Member
If we are fair, Xavi's title-winning team did also display good underlying statistics with a lot of luck in hand also. So we were lucky in a lot of instances, but that also isn't the whole picture as we performed very well in defensive statistics generally.

The truth is he was an okay manager. Not awful, not amazing, just okay, and his years here were adequate. I don't believe he would have taken the team further but it wasn't a disaster under him.
 

RedxMAK

Active member
If we are fair, Xavi's title-winning team did also display good underlying statistics with a lot of luck in hand also. So we were lucky in a lot of instances, but that also isn't the whole picture as we performed very well in defensive statistics generally.

The truth is he was an okay manager. Not awful, not amazing, just okay, and his years here were adequate. I don't believe he would have taken the team further but it wasn't a disaster under him.
Yeah exactly. Look I admit there were some points where we were kinda lucky. But most of the time, it wasn’t luck you don’t get 26 clean sheets and 20 goals conceded in 38 games with luck. It’s just the brilliant performance of the defence and the goalkeeper. The main trait of that team was the ability to play in huge adversity and still grind points. We won in Bilbao, Osasuna, Betis, Sevilla, Atleti, Sociedad. All away from home, not even the greatest Barcelona sides have done that in one season…
 

Messigician

Senior Member
You should know every time you bring up numbers, you should cite a source
OR you are pulling the numbers out of your arse (nothing personal, general rule)

Let's see if what you write has any truth in it:

1/10/22: Mallorca - Barca 0-1, xG: 1.16 - 0.73, Big chances: 1-0
3 pts INSTEAD of 0pts

9/10/22: Barca - Celta 1-0, xG: 1.16 - 0.73, Big chances: 2-2
3pts INSTEAD of 1 pt

8/1/23: Atleti - Barca 0-1, xG: 1.84 - 0.66, Big chances: 2-2
3pts INSTEAD of 1 pt

22/1/23: Barca - Getafe 1-0, xG: 0.73 - 1.08 , Big chances: 1-4
3 pts INSTEAD of 0 pts

28/1/23: Girona - Barca 0-1:, xG: 1.06 - 1.1, Big chances: 2-1
3 pts INSTEAD of 0 pts

12/3/23: Bilbao - Barca 0-1: xG: 0.87 - 0.9, Big changes 2-1
3 pts INSTEAD of 0 pts

10/4/23: Barca - Girona 0-0: xG: 1.31 - 0.6, Big chances 0-1
1pt INSTEAD of 0 pts

(I stopped looking after the date we clinched the title mathematically)
Source: Fotmob

So, in all these games we got UNDESERVED points, because of luck and Stegen.
in particular we got 19 pts instead of the 2 pts we deserved based on our performance.

So Xavi was gifted by luck and Stegen 17 more points than what he prepared his team for.
And I am not even talking the terrorist football we were forced to watch those months.
I am only talking results based on chances here

PS: By contrast, Flick had lower Big chances than the opponent in 5 games this season in all comps:
Monaco, Osasuna, Celta, Betis, Sociedad (2 of them because of the RED cards)
which we ALL lost

On the other hand, we got robbed by luck and our attackers in 3 games already: Las Palmas, and the two infamous ones against Leganes and Atleti
So he was lying?
 

Birdy

Senior Member
Statistics are not always anything and do not always show the entire picture. Like what Maradona37 said, you shouldn’t rely on them to show how good a team played in a game. If that were the case, Real Madrid’s win over us in last October’s El Clasico was undeserved as we had more xG and the same amount of big chances. But no, we deserved to lose because of us giving them too much respect in the second half. Just cause there’s a slight difference in big chances and xG, doesn’t prove anything to how the game was played. Like I said, in Barcelona, the winning comes first, when your performance can’t be good enough to win your way, you have to win eitherway. We are not Dortmund or Arsenal to be happy playing well and losing. There’s no shame in playing badly and winning.

There is MUCH shame in playing badly and winning if you are Fc Barcelona.
That's our identity, our DNA

Have said it time and time again to the many gloryhunters here: if you want just wins and trophies w/o the football, you are at the wrong club. Go support Madrid or Juventus

Big part of the reason Xavi was kicked out was the football, whether some like it or not.
His luck ended in 23/24, after he had exhausted it in 22/23

In Fc Barcelona, football comes first. The base is the football, on the top of which results (and trophies) have to come. But it's not the other way round
 

Birdy

Senior Member
If we are fair, Xavi's title-winning team did also display good underlying statistics with a lot of luck in hand also. So we were lucky in a lot of instances, but that also isn't the whole picture as we performed very well in defensive statistics generally.

The truth is he was an okay manager. Not awful, not amazing, just okay, and his years here were adequate. I don't believe he would have taken the team further but it wasn't a disaster under him.

If we look and the underlying defensive metrics, they might look good for the 22/23 team.

STill, the point of the debate was whether we got lucky points, and some objected the fact that we got.
Some with the usual worn out motto 'you don't win trophies by luck' which football has proven wrong time and time again.

The data was presented to them that categorically proves we got 17 more points in games we didn't deserve.
That was all luck plus Stegen.

And that is not only stats, mind you. It's eye test also
We all remember those games and those months of terrible football, that we were discussing in here after each game how lucky we were, and how Stegen saved us in X or Y situation
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top