[MENTION=16942]BBZ8800[/MENTION]
lets wait and see what happens with Frenkie.
De Ligt, if (and its looking likely) he does only want the money, hes just as bad if not worse than Rabiot - Raiola is the worst of the lot in terms of greed
as for Rakitic, hes been a great servent but respectfully, its time to leave. Valverde playing him the most doesn't mean much when you see what a biased, shit manager he is
You know, I have mentioned one practical rule which is almost always right, yet people here love to ignore it over and over:
1. if a player is a starter under several different coaches in a row=he must be a very good player, according to actual football coaches even though fans don't like a player
2. on the other hand, if several different coaches in a row don't rate a player as highly as fans do=a player is usually not as good as fans think
But then someone will throw: Salah and De Bruyne.
Fine, it happens once in 20 or once in 50 cases that a coach makes a mistake.
But in general, if a player doesn't play, there is usually a very strong reason for that.
You can then think about cases like:
= Semedo, not a first pick by EV. And nowhere near an NT team in Portugal.
Which is more likely: EV is an idiot or Semedo is an average-ish player?
= Malcom, not played by EV, not called by a Brasilian NT coach, no big teams after him
Which is more likely: EV is an idiot or fans are overrating Malcom?
= Dembele, not playing under EV, not playing under Deschamps who uses even midfielders as wingers instead of him.
Which is more likely: coaches are idiots or people are overrating Dembouz?
Regarding your post, a huge bias again.
Your post sounds as if Rakitic played for Barca ONLY because EV is stupid and because Rakitic is EV's favorite.
But, then you have some "funny" stats.
EV as a coach:
Rakitic 109 matches
Busquets 104 matches
Messi 104 matches
Alba 102 matches
Pique 101 matches
Suarez 100 matches
So, Rakitic is THE MOST USED player of our team since EV is a coach.
But, what is even "funnier" is:
Barca under Lucho:
Rakitic 159 matches
Messi 158 matches
Busquets 148 matches
Suarez 147 matches
Alba 128 matches
Pique 131 matches
Iniesta 123 matches
So, quite weird, isn't it?
Raki, who is a pure shit, according to 90% of posters here, was the MOST USED BARCA's PLAYER under 2 different coaches. So, our MOST USED PLAYER in the last 5 years.
So, again, you have 2 options:
1. Rakitic is actually a quite good player and possesses some virtues which ALL coaches love
2. or: Rakitic is a pure shit and BOTH Ev and Lucho are idiots and don't know anything about football (even though they won 4 La Ligas in 5 years), unlike any average poster who KNOWS that Frenkie-Arthur-Alena is the answer
Do I need to mention several different Croatia's coaches in the last 12 years, who all had a weird obsession with playing Rakitic in EVERY SINGLE game and NEVER subbing him or giving him a rest?
I mean, coaches were often resting and subbing Modric, but Rakitic=almost never.
All coaches are forcing him to die on a field and nobody wants to play without him.
That is not only EV or 2 coaches. That happened under at least 5 different coaches in a row.
Further, I have asked on several other topics, what is the solution if Rakitic leaves a club?
Frenkie-Arthur-Busi?
When you remove a bias and Barca's DNA glasses:
1. EV likes Rakitic more than Arthur
2. stats say that Rakitic was better in every single aspect of a game than Arthur in this season
3. I tried to post ratings from NEUTRAL journos from England in matches between Barca vs Man Utd, where NEUTRAL journos always gave the lowest ratings to Arthur out of 3 midfielders
So, basically, forum decided that it is time for Arthur instead of Raki, while:
1. a coach, EV don't think that way
2. stats don't think that way
3. neutral fans (who are not infected with Barca's DNA disease/bais/subjective opinion) don't think that way
The only part of fans who rate Arthur:
= Barca fans who are desperate for: young players, La Masia players or players who have Barca's DNA or resemble on someone from mighty Pep's era.
So, imagine if you were Man Utd or Liverpool's fan reading this forum.
And if you weren't biased towards Barca's DNA.
Would you go for numbers and objective factors or for a classical alibi reply: you are an idiot, you need to WATCH matches to see who is better.
Again, you would drop Raki (who is far from his prime, I agree) for a guy who is good in only 3 areas:
1. getting the ball out of our half
2. keeping possession till death without any risks
3. being press resistant
Scoring goals: zero
Assists: zero
Forward passes: almost zero
Defending: zero
Physique: zero
I mean, if we had 3 Frenkies in our team, I would say: oh, fine. We should play 3 Frenkies.
But if solutions instead of Raki is Busi who is even worse, and Arthur who is far behing him and who already have weight, stamina and pace problems aged 23, then: no thanks.
The sad truth is that even Raki, who is a limited player in a lot of aspects is still our 2nd best midfielder behind Frenkie.
So, if you want to sell Raki, you'll need 2-3 new players who are actually very, very good.