Joan Laporta

khaled_a_d

Senior Member
Not selling Fati for 150M was dumb, if the offer was real. But not because of what happened with him afterwards. He just wasn't that special when you got past the hype.

Fati was lethal, he was probably the best finisher at the age of 18 or under that we have ever seen. He always knew how to place the ball in the toughest position to the GK.
The idea was he had a potential to be 30 goals per years for 15 years, which was fair assessment. He wasn't going to be the guy mesmerising defensers and entertaining fans, like Lamine. He was more of a Romario, or a higher potential David Villa.
 
Last edited:

Barcaman

Administrator
Staff member
Fati was lethal, he was probably the best finisher at the age of 18 or under that we have ever seen. He always knew how to place the ball in the toughest position to the GK.
The idea was he had a potential to be 30 goals per years for 15 years, which was fair assessment. He wasn't going to be the guy mesmerising defensers and entertaining fans, like Lamibe. He was more of a Romario, or a gigher potential Savid Villa.

Good comparison with Villa and Romario.
 

malvolio

Senior Member
Fati was lethal, he was probably the best finisher at the age of 18 or under that we have ever seen. He always knew how to place the ball in the toughest position to the GK.
The idea was he had a potential to be 30 goals per years for 15 years, which was fair assessment. He wasn't going to be the guy mesmerising defensers and entertaining fans, like Lamine. He was more of a Romario, or a higher potential David Villa.
A footballer doesn't forget how to play because of injuries. He had lots of chances to prove himself but eventually disappointed.

His whole game was trying first time shots. If those didn't get in he was anonymous.

He wasn't terrible, but 150M? Would have snapped that with both hands. I guess our reasoning as a club is heavily influenced by finding the next Messi.
 

jamrock

Senior Member
Fati was lethal, he was probably the best finisher at the age of 18 or under that we have ever seen. He always knew how to place the ball in the toughest position to the GK.
The idea was he had a potential to be 30 goals per years for 15 years, which was fair assessment. He wasn't going to be the guy mesmerising defensers and entertaining fans, like Lamine. He was more of a Romario, or a higher potential David Villa.

The romario is a bit too far lol, but yea exactly.

Won't add anything else.
 

jamrock

Senior Member
Laporta

"Once again, we are beloved world wide, for who we are, what we do and how we do it".

Something that piece of shit Barto just never understood.
 

Joan

Well-known member
A footballer doesn't forget how to play because of injuries. He had lots of chances to prove himself but eventually disappointed.
Fati didn't forget how to play. But injuries can definitely define your career path. He'll always be a step or two late if he tries to play like he used to before injuries and thus come flat. Overcoming that, completely reinventing your playing style is a tough ordeal even for senior players. With Fati's body and likely confidence both shot it's unlikely he ever comes any good but that doesn't mean he didn't have potential.

His main traits like finishing and positioning, being in the right place in the right time are all heavily influenced by his physical limitations.

It's easy to say now we should've taken the money and run. But I can guarantee we'll be seeing similar posts in case Yamal suffers a career changing injury (knocking on wood).
 

khaled_a_d

Senior Member
A footballer doesn't forget how to play because of injuries.

That is wrong, though.
How you play is a neural and physical abilities. You lose them you lose the ability to play.
If your body isn't able to do what it is used to do, it literally means you forgot how to play. Fati simply doesn't have the same body he had 3 years ago. Not the same talent nor anything really.
 

jamrock

Senior Member
Clearly he hasn't gotten how to play, he's still doing the footballing things he use to, but his body can't execute at the highest level.

That's the issue, he's getting to the spots he use to a second player and can't separate from him marker.

But he's coming back this season!!
 

FCBarca

Mike the Knife
Laporta is very corrupted. Employing his family members, overpaying/doing favors to agents.

There is no villain and hero here. It's not a cartoon.

I watched Laporta as a cule in both tenures and seen the corporate corruption of Rosell & Bartomeu that nearly collapsed the club

Not a cartoon, not a film, just real life at our club - you seem obsessed with undercutting Laporta whenever possible despite presiding over the best periods our club has ever seen, including the post-Messi era that is on track to be better than anyone could have imagined considering the dire state it was left in by corporate cretins

Maybe you’re simply a cynic and might benefit from more cartoons in your life
 
Last edited:

Loki

Well-known member
I want to highlight Laporta's decision again to sack Xavi and to install Hansi after this back and forth theater last season. You can imagine under what kind of pressure Laporta was with Xavi at the end of last season, when he first begged him to stay and after months of asking and agreeing in the end, he still fired him for Hansi Flick.
And he didn't fire anyone, but Xavi, one of the biggest and most recent club legends loved by all culers.

Laporta knew what kind of risks he was taking throwing Xavi out and picking up a new coach who had many bad critics after his Germany job, who didn't speak any spanish nor knew the club or the league. If Flick didn't work out, Laporta's reelection would have been in serious danger and he still proceeded with his gut feeling that Hansi was the right person to bring the club back to success.
Of course the season is still very young, just 1/4th of LaLiga and 2 CL games played, but it could have alredy went into the wrong direction. Instead, we scored 33 goals in 10 LL matches, 11 more than under Xavi at this point, brought back the excitement and fun while under the most difficult circumstances of 8-9 players injured and just one new summer signing with Olmo.

Of course we need to wait the next two games to seee where we stand under Flick and they can go incredibly well and boost Flick's standing, or put us down to earth again, but today, right now, it was the absolutely right call of Laporta, many me included didn't support completely. Flick brought back the winning-, the rolling over your opponents mentality, while Xavi told the press not to expect much.

By all his faults, thank you Laporta for not choosing the comfortable side in keeping Xavi, but risking somthing with Flick. I hope I will not eat these words in the end of the season, but at this moment it looks very good.
 

companyofcules

Well-known member
You can't defend Xavi because he was part of the ousting of Koeman and Messi. So why should I cry for him when he didn't for our biggest legends.
And unlike Koeman he had the money and was pardoned for his failings 3 times.
Laporta is guilty only for giving hope to Xavistas. But they are ruthless anyway.
The decision looks like it was right but the way he sacked Xavi wasn't and never will be even if Flick wins a sextupe and Xavi never coaches again.
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top