Dont get me wrong, I hate our strategy, but Reals has yet to bear fruits as well. Hakimi and Odegaard are not sure bets. Neither are Fati or Trincao and the likes. We will see how things turn out, and financially I agree with you, but betting on talent is a dangerous game.
What fruits would you expect at this stage if you were an RM fan? Or last season?
Last season we found at least one replacement at LB, this season we found another. We continued to wind down contracts of players who are past it, but can't be kicked out because they still have something to give provided they don't play in exactly the same setup all the time (i.e. slot in Mendy, Valverde, Hazard and Asensio at different times). These vets stop being seen as a problem if a manager and the board treat them with merit, meaning they don't get played when they're a reason for us losing (Marcelo) and they don't get unwarranted extensions (Modric). You think they're a problem because we're not winning? Fair enough. How do you explain most literate fans being happy with how we're being run and the opposite being the case at Barca?
Talent is always a gamble, but it's better than barely anything like Barca are. And when you're doing it responsibly, you can't help but be optimistic. It's understanding of a strategic gamble. If it's just Messi's titles that reassure of a being level with us, then I don't understand how you can be more certain things will be OK going forward when you take that away.
Ronaldo does not have same ties to Real as Messi does to Barca. It is not even close.
He also wanted to leave and add to his CV another league win in another country.
Why do these ties matter so much? Raul, a club legend, got binned when it got ridiculous. Iker did as well, as he should have. SAF binned Keane. Inter fell on their own sword by keeping the people who delivered their CL after Mou left. These are difficult decisions, but it's in everyone else's interest to make them. Messi is 33 and people really want to believe he is worth sacrificing another 3 years of recruitment by buying players who must at least be able to be shoehorned into positions around him as he gets older and older? While also staying behind the status of other vets?
They had ?replacements? like Hernandez, Vallejo, Llorente, Kovacic and Ceballos who all failed. The Brazilian wonder kids may flop easily. Their squad and depth are mediocre.
Forgot to add Isco to the old core. That guy is also dead.
Theo is doing great at Milan, Llorente is currently immense at Atleti, Kovacic great at Chelsea, Ceballos is up in the air in a shit Arsenal side. Vallejo is still 23 and already experienced quite a bit, while also playing well vs the likes of Juve, his problem is being a glass boy so it's as stupid to call him a failure as it is to say Hazard is a flop. None are failures, only never been better than their seniors at Real. Easy to jump to these words.
Isco isn't dead as he showed vs City. He's just a squad guy who never reached the level he was slated to get to.