Get Mata for that 20 and sell Jeffren to Valencia I say(with a buy-back option probably)... not to mention keep Ibra
I want us to make Valencia our affiliated club
valencia are the only capable club of challengint rela and barce. with barcelona buying thier best player the gap widens.
its becoming obvious la liga he heading down the scotland route. real/barce celtic/rangers - the rest before a ball is kicked admit 3rd is at most they can hope for.
mainly because real and barca negotiate your own tv deals. it needs to be like the premier league. the premier league negotiates the deal and all 20 clubs get a cut evenly.
la liga needs to negotiate the tv deals on all clubs behalf and give every club the same amount. barcelona and real madrid should get no more than the newly promoted teams.
barcelona and real madrid will propably both get more than 100 points next year in the league.
Oh great this argument again. EPL is equally dominated by United and Chelsea and while the race for 3-7 is closer it doesn't say anything about the overall quality of either league. People like to think that La Liga's 3-20 teams are crap but in reality the gap is caused by the incredibly quick improvement of both Barcelona and Madrid. Just three seasons ago Villareal came in second above Barcelona, and a few other teams were in contention up until the last round of the season.
Yes, it's greater, but that doesn't change the fact that other leagues are two horse-races as well. The point difference between the 2nd and 3rd placed teams in the Premier League this season was 10 points. While it isn't as great of a difference as in La Liga, it is great enough that it effectively alienates Arsenal from the top two teams. And note the fact that the average number of points gained by the third-placed team from the last ten seasons is 69, while Valencia earned 71 points this season. Calculate it yourself if you don't believe it. Valencia performed better than the typical third-placed Spanish team, and they would have earned a lot more points had they not basically thrown away all those matches when it was almost certain that they made the CL spot. The gap is due to Real Madrid and Barcelona improving so drastically over the last couple years, not because the quality of the league. While I agree that collective TV revenue is something that needs to be done, claims about the Premier League being competitive because of collective TV revenue is bullshit. It's competitive because it's a playground for billionaires.
Yes, yes and yes. Estel I understand what you're saying but Barcelona and Madrid recognizing their own vast improvements hardly counts as a campaign to stabilize the league.
Yes, it's greater, but that doesn't change the fact that other leagues are two horse-races as well. The point difference between the 2nd and 3rd placed teams in the Premier League this season was 10 points. While it isn't as great of a difference as in La Liga, it is great enough that it effectively alienates Arsenal from the top two teams. And note the fact that the average number of points gained by the third-placed team from the last ten seasons is 69, while Valencia earned 71 points this season. Calculate it yourself if you don't believe it. Valencia performed better than the typical third-placed Spanish team, and they would have earned a lot more points had they not basically thrown away all those matches when it was almost certain that they made the CL spot. The gap is due to Real Madrid and Barcelona improving so drastically over the last couple years, not because the quality of the league. While I agree that collective TV revenue is something that needs to be done, claims about the Premier League being competitive because of collective TV revenue is bullshit. It's competitive because it's a playground for billionaires.
real madrid got 96 points and didnt win the league.
in the premiership 85 points will win you the league. arsenal finished 11 points of the top whilst valencia were over 25 points behind real madrid. also we were in the race.
valencias financial problems are well known. one reason why they sold villa. no doubt valencia are a weaker team whilst barce are stronger and the gap will widen next year. could valencia of perhaps held onto him if the were in a stronger position? if they recieved more money and barcelona didnt have as much (which would be the case if money was distributed evenly) - the transfer may not have happened which would keep valencia closer to real and barce.
real madrid and barcelona have a monopoly of the league and unless changes are made real and barca will continue to get richer and pull further away form the chasing pack. ive already said i reckon you both well get over 100 points next year.
dont take this as an attack. i can simply see a serious flaw in la liga at the moment. to say there is nothing wrong with a team getting 96 points and not winning the league would be turning a blind eye.
But Manchester United, Liverpool, and Arsenal have financial problems as well. The difference is that the Premier League is a playground for billionaires, and when a team goes down (ie. Liverpool), there's a team backed by a billionaire that's waiting to take that spot (ie. Spurs, Man City). Lack of collective TV rights didn't get Valencia into the shithole that they're in now, they were bound to end up like that with the way they were running things. The thing is, even if collective TV rights happens, it's not gonna change things like people are expecting it to. Spanish teams other than Real Madrid and Barcelona just don't have the power to attract top players, except Valencia, who would have been financially fucked regardless of collective TV rights, and maybe Atletico Madrid, UNLESS there's an influx of oil money in the league, which tbh I'm not sure I want that to happen. Yes, collective TV rights might make clubs like Mallorca financially healthier off the pitch, but it's not gonna do wonders on the pitch like people are expecting, the competitiveness will stay the same, and clubs like Mallorca and Valencia are frankly only in the financial positions they're in now because of their own bad choices and irresponsibilities.
I'm not against collective TV rights or anything, it's just that I think it's...dare I say...overrated.