Julián Álvarez

[Saladin]

We should have bought Alvarez and not Roque.

Now there is no point in this purchase.

You wouldn't take him over RL9? Roque and Alvarez sounds freaking awesome.

 

[malvolio]

50mil? Don't believe that for a second. Send Lewy to Saudi and sign Alvarez.

Every major club on the planet would have submitted a bid already. Short therm, don't see him leaving unless Pep leaves.

Then again, I think he would want to be top dog in City's attack. Him or Haaland has to leave in a year or two. Still young and already won a lot there. For sure he's targeting a move to Barca/Real eventually.

 

[iniestaGOAT]

We should have bought Alvarez and not Roque.

Now there is no point in this purchase.

We should have? Roque has wolrd class potential.

Alvarez is another overhyped PL player. Not surprising. Every city player is overrated here.

 

[fergus90]

Alvarez as good as a player he is will get nowhere near the numbers of Haaland to be the main attacker. So if it was a choice between them, City would be ditching Alvarez.

Alvarez is class though as he’s versatile, he’s able to perform everywhere across the attacking positions. Performed at CAM very well this year.

 

[Nazario1985]

Alvarez as good as a player he is will get nowhere near the numbers of Haaland to be the main attacker. So if it was a choice between them, City would be ditching Alvarez.

Alvarez is class though as he’s versatile, he’s able to perform everywhere across the attacking positions. Performed at CAM very well this year.

Alvarez goals are more important than those of Haaland
Also Alvarez without goals is a very important player
A Haaland not scoring is literally playing with 10 men

 

[fergus90]

Alvarez goals are more important than those of Haaland
Also Alvarez without goals is a very important player
A Haaland not scoring is literally playing with 10 men

In what sense are they more important?

Haaland is missing De Bruyne no doubt but City are not dropping someone who scored 52 goals in 53 games because he didn’t score in the Champions League semi final or final.

 

[Porque]

Ship has sailed. Chosen Ferran over him will go down in history as a mistake. But not a huge one as Xavi probably wouldn't have got the best out of Alvarez anyways.

 

[Nazario1985]

In what sense are they more important?

Haaland is missing De Bruyne no doubt but City are not dropping someone who scored 52 goals in 53 games because he didn’t score in the Champions League semi final or final.

Haaland score most of his goal when the team is already dominating the gameplay or outscoring the opponent
Alvez is usually brought as a joker and succeed.
But most importantly when Haaland don't score he end up with a 5 or 6 scoring at most including finals when shit get though
Alvarez is not only goal scoring but playmaking with City and Argentina.

 

[malvolio]

In what sense are they more important?

Haaland is missing De Bruyne no doubt but City are not dropping someone who scored 52 goals in 53 games because he didn’t score in the Champions League semi final or final.

He is probably referring to their current form, NT and club. There were some important goals scored by Alvarez this season for City.

And he usually scores more golazos than Haaland + free-kicks. But it could be that you are right and Haaland is a better fit for City's setup.

 

[Nazario1985]

Also why are we talking about Alvarez ..
Pep only sell us his rejects so unless Alvarez spit on him i don't see that coming … and we are BROKE

 

[Blanco]

Since Gavi is injured this guy has no competition for “the most overrated player” prize.

 

[JustZanetti4]

Good player.

 

[Horatio]

Good player.

aye

 

[JustZanetti4]

aye

Not as good as CR7, Mbappe, Haaland et al but good

 

[Fati_Future_BallonDor]

Not as good as CR7, Mbappe, Haaland et al but good

call me crazy dude but i would take Kane over Haaland atm