Kylian Mbappé

Paul

New member
FFP sounds like a joke anyway, a team like PSG or City can sign fake sponsorship deals such as "Qatar sponsors PSG for 10000000 billion dollars per season" or UAE sponsors City for "1b per day".

This Fair Play thing works more against us or Madrid, if Madrid would be signing Kaka for 120m and Ronaldo for 220m, ad a few more players for a combined sum of another 150m and they're already more than half a billion down, of course, this happened in 2009 (when sums weren't yet as crazy) and the FFP came into effect the September after Madrid's big signings, consider that a reason for FFP, but PSG and City have different ways of financing themselves.

I'd rather RM 3peat than see PSG validate themselves and the idea that you can buy yourself to a title just with the flick of a checkbook.

No f way! I may not like what is happening but I am a Barca fan, no way I would back up rma ever against PSG, this is hilarious. Rma are the main reason for what is happening now, they were the ones who made transfers a huge deal in the first place starting in 2000, and as I said, their 2009 campaign was a reason for FFP. Anybody but those assholes!
 
Last edited:

KingMessi

SiempreBlaugrana
FFP sounds like a joke anyway, a team like PSG or City can sign fake sponsorship deals such as "Qatar sponsors PSG for 10000000 billion dollars per season" or UAE sponsors City for "1b per day".

This Fair Play thing works more against us or Madrid, if Madrid would be signing Kaka for 120m and Ronaldo for 220m, ad a few more players for a combined sum of another 150m and they're already more than half a billion down, of course, this happened in 2009 (when sums weren't yet as crazy) and the FFP came into effect the September after Madrid's big signings, consider that a reason for FFP, but PSG and City have different ways of financing themselves.



No f way! I may not like what is happening but I am a Barca fan, no way I would back up rma ever against PSG, this is hilarious. Rma are the main reason for what is happening now, they were the ones who made transfers a huge deal in the first place starting in 2000, and as I said, their 2009 campaign was a reason for FFP. Anybody but those assholes!

It's like asking whether you want to lose your left leg or your right leg. Who the fuck cares? I'd be in pain either way.
 

Paul

New member
No way, PSG winning the UCL is almost the same as any other team for me, actually, way on top of the list of neutral teams I wouldn't mind, but rma? lol no way, not even if City buys our whole team, turns Nou Camp into a Etihad Airport, we play in Segunda B for 5 years and make us wear light blue home shirts for the same time I won't want to see rma win instead of them :lol:.
 
My feeling is that he's going to Paris and will be the new "Neymar of Barca", in Ney's shadows.
City would be an excellent choice for him, not only he can be in the spotlight more, but with Pep and a squad full of youngsters he will feel excellent + the Premier League is light years better than drowning in the Ligue 1 where you play Angers, Troyes, Caen etc.

oh yea middlesbrough, stoke, those mighty clubs.
Shit on L1 using the liga, anything else is ridiculous. It is the hallmark of stupidity to look down on every single person not quite as good as you.
 

Paul

New member
oh yea middlesbrough, stoke, those mighty clubs.
Shit on L1 using the liga, anything else is ridiculous. It is the hallmark of stupidity to look down on every single person not quite as good as you.

Boro isn't in PL anymore, Stoke is more than OK for a team who finishes bottom, just like others who hardly survived, see West Ham, a team more than impressive for one that may have feared a relegation, or even Palace... hell, even Leicester that hardly made it last year, was good enough to beat a top 4 Spanish team.
Then you have the top teams who are title contenders, Arsenal as 5th compared to Marseille or Bordeaux is like comparing Barcelona or rma to Benfica or Porto.
France is a good chunk of floors underneath the level of PL.
 

BenRobbins

New member
Surely Real won't lose out to PSG on this one. Monaco refused to sell them Fabinho, let alone sell them a player who could guarantee them the league for the next 10 years when they could easily sell him abroad.

Not buying it.
 

Paul

New member
Maybe he just wants to play for Paris, after all, being 19, even if he spends 5 more years at "home" (given he's from there) he would be 24 when he would move to his dream team from Muadrid.
 

George_Costanza

Active member
Surely Real won't lose out to PSG on this one. Monaco refused to sell them Fabinho, let alone sell them a player who could guarantee them the league for the next 10 years when they could easily sell him abroad.

Not buying it.


I don't think Real can afford this one just because Nike wants Mbappe to only play for a club that has a contract with Nike. Mbappe has an advertising contract with Mbappe and only can move to PSG, Man City or Barcelona. Nike didn't say anything when Neymar moved to PSG but if he had decided to move to club where Nike has no relation then that might been an issue for Neymar.
 

Lutece FC

New member
Surely Real won't lose out to PSG on this one. Monaco refused to sell them Fabinho, let alone sell them a player who could guarantee them the league for the next 10 years when they could easily sell him abroad.

Not buying it.

Yep you're right. Monaco board refuses to sell us one of their player. I respect that.

Maybe he just wants to play for Paris, after all, being 19, even if he spends 5 more years at "home" (given he's from there) he would be 24 when he would move to his dream team from Muadrid.

Plus he's a parisian child.
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top