JamDav1982
Senior Member
well in Germany you go to jail for tax evasion in Spain you get Ballon d'or
Poor effort.
well in Germany you go to jail for tax evasion in Spain you get Ballon d'or
If it is based on fair market value, the 10 k Qatari companies won't bring in much individually because there is "premium" space and common space. The more sponsors you have, the less premium it is and the less you can charge for every one of them.
Anyway, PSG aren't going to do that.
One of the interesting twist this new FFP is taking and people are ignoring is that it broadens the previous rule used for related parties to non related parties. It is actually a counter to state owned clubs. For example, let's say Qatar invest in a joint venture with Cochonou and then Cochonou decides to sponsor PSG with a contract with unfair value. This new FFP would block this kind of moves which i suspect Qatar would be keen on doing. Nice win for historical clubs.
well in Germany you go to jail for tax evasion in Spain you get Ballon d'or
Absolutely. But it needed to be relaxed in a way to allow the big clubs to return and maximised to their pre Covid revenues.
And their should have been a bigger dialogue over how the salary cap is generated.
Instead Tebas went (on public appearance, perhaps if we have all the details he is correct) hard against any opposite view because Barcelona and Madrid didn't agree to the CVC.
You don't set different rule, you apply it differently.
Sounds corrupt, but there is a reason it literally happens everywhere
Oof, changing goalposts from shady dealings of club exes?
But if you want to play, you win Ballon D'Ors for winning multiple (3,4) CLs in Spain, not the occasional COVID CL
Oof, changing goalposts from shady dealings of club exes?
But if you want to play, you win Ballon D'Ors for winning multiple (3,4) CLs in Spain, not the occasional COVID CL
no moving goalpost here, your hero is a convicted tax fraud and if he lived in germany there would be no BDOs and CLs but jail time.
If it is based on fair market value, the 10 k Qatari companies won't bring in much individually because there is "premium" space and common space. The more sponsors you have, the less premium it is and the less you can charge for every one of them.
Anyway, PSG aren't going to do that.
One of the interesting twist this new FFP is taking and people are ignoring is that it broadens the previous rule used for related parties to non related parties. It is actually a counter to state owned clubs. For example, let's say Qatar invest in a joint venture with Cochonou and then Cochonou decides to sponsor PSG with a contract with unfair value. This new FFP would block this kind of moves which i suspect Qatar would be keen on doing. Nice win for historical clubs.
Why did your convicted tax fraud get re-elected as Bayern President then? Please dont dodge now
no moving goalpost here, your hero is a convicted tax fraud and if he lived in germany there would be no BDOs and CLs but jail time.
well in Germany you go to jail for tax evasion in Spain you get Ballon d'or
Agreed that La Liga salary cap should have been relaxed until COVID's impact is completely cleared, but should be done for all clubs and not just us and Madrid.
To be fair, Madrid was never hindered by the cap and I don't think the salary cap is the reason why Madrid didn't get Mbappe. They probably couldn't afford to match PSG's offer or they could but didn't want, I am guessing.