PSG had better more expensive team than every side they eliminated.
Navas didnt play the semi and lost the final... is Messi naming him best keeper in what he did to get them past Atalanta in QF?
Mbappe getting the vote for failing to score in knockout stages and getting a couple of assists against average sides?
The idea that PSG had great individuals that took them far falls flat when look at teams they beat and how much Navas/Mbappe really did.
Navas was immense in the QF against Atalanta. Kept PSG in it with some big saves so that they could pull of the late game dramatics. And was solid as usual in another final.
Often times, voters do take into account previous performances beyond the last season. Navas' 3 peat in the CL and his performances for Real Madrid in the league and specifically El Clasicos wouldve factored in.
In regards to Mbappe, it isn't just Messi voting him that high. Several other voters placed him in their top 3 and he eventually finished 7th. It's not some off the board vote. And could be just appreciation for a talented prodigy, much like Messi was at that age.
How expensive the PSG team does not necessarily speak to the quality. We've seen it with Barca spending hundreds of millions on subpar players.