Of course I know that and that is the answer I expected, so here comes my point:
Is Messi so different from back then (age adjusted answer please)
or
is all of the other players and the managers so shit compared to then.
Messi has played the same game since 2010. He has reinvented himself a couple of times. He has lost some abilities and gained some others.
Messi is worse at nearly everything except maybe set pieces, but that peak Barca team would be able to make it work with this Messi as well, because they were too good all over the field. It is true that Messi showed some of the same weakness, albeit not to this degree in my opinion.
So, I guess the answer is that if you'd have the greatest team around Messi, they could hide his weaknesses and would make even current Messi effective.
This only shows how stupid are the comments who said Messi carried Barca at that point
. You showed this point very well.
But he was never, in no way shape or form a pressing or "make runs behind the defence all game long" machine. He pressed when he felt there was a chance, and made runs when he caught the defence sleeping and a good ball was about to come.
He knows how to play in a free position system. Drifting left, center, right or anywhere, depending on the game situation. As every other player in that team. There was just no fixed position per se.
And you constantly accuse him of four things.
1. He does not press - Which he never did.
2. He does not make runs behind the defence - Which he mostly did in his teens and since then a couple of times per game (with passers like Xavi and Iniesta providing).
3. He does not stick to his position and drops deep - Which is what all his game has been about since 2010.
4. He is to blame for the board keeping the other seniors and EV - Which is simply at best case scenario - unknown. And even if all that is true, that is not his responsibility, but the boards.
So you basically (except 4) don't just call out Messi a bad player overall now, but since 2010. That's my point.
Most of this is not true, or not true to the extent being made to appear here.
Messi pressed more during Pep. No doubt. Under no circumstances he ran 7 km in the decisive games. I remember he ran something like 10km in the final vs United on Wembley, that's like almost 50% more than vs Bayern. An enormous difference. So, yes, pressing was not his strong points, but he did ran more, no doubt.
He didn't make runs behind the defense because teams sat back vs us almost all the time out of fear of being humiliated. There was no space to run into. We had to constantly unlock teams because we were so dominant on the ball teams rarely used a high line or pressed us. When they did, Messi did runs no doubt. We were actually very good on the counterattack, but rarely got to show that side of us more often.
So, you're telling me that if he did some things that were feasible back then, when we had the greatest team and the greatest manager, then it's fine if he plays the same only worse, even though we lack all the things that made it work back then? And somehow it's the club's duty to assemble the greatest team around him so he can still do that and afford those luxuries?
Sorry, doesn't work that way. He needs to change, like the team did. It's easier to replace 33-35 year old Messi and change the dynamics of the team than to buy a whole team to hide his increasing flaws.
He had the ability to make 120 dribbles in a CL season back then.
The ability to fold any left back or CB in the world if he put his mind to it.
Insane acceleration in short runs (physical prime)
Insane lateral movement and agility (best I've seen along with R10 prime)
A much stronger shot, especially from outside the box. He shot some rockets back then.
All of these things have faded and the shortcomings he already had in 2010 are that much more evident.
The only thing he's improved in since then is passing.
And this. Offensively he was a different beast.