ammarfcb
ze special one
Someone give me some info on Iturra. Please!
is that your way of saying he's comin to liverpool?
Someone give me some info on Iturra. Please!
No....
Málagas goal was only marginally offside, and the ball would've entered anyway. Dortmund players were offside twice for their goal, first when the cross was made (4-5 players clearly offside) and when the ball came to the guy who scored. And I guess the timing has something to do with it.
Málagas goal was only marginally offside, and the ball would've entered anyway. Dortmund players were offside twice for their goal, first when the cross was made (4-5 players clearly offside) and when the ball came to the guy who scored. And I guess the timing has something to do with it.
The ball wasn't going in without eliseu's deflection. And it was clear offside live on tv too. It doesn't explain their reaction, imo. They are ignoring the fact their 2nd goal wasn't legit too. With these 2 goals cancelled, dortmund still wins.
Isn't the law that if the player is in line with the ball he is not offside?
The ball wasn't going in without eliseu's deflection. And it was clear offside live on tv too. It doesn't explain their reaction, imo. They are ignoring the fact their 2nd goal wasn't legit too. With these 2 goals cancelled, dortmund still wins.
He was in front of the ball line.
The ball is on the line of the grass, he is a little in front. But I don't think that matters here, as the other malaga player is onside. The ball line rule is for when there's no defender. He is offside despite the ball line.
I don't think there needs to be a defender for the ball line rule to kick in. But I am not sure. If you can confirm, that'd be great.