S7_MUFC
New member
I have to agree about chelsea having amazing squad but most of the players you mentioned are recent signings and it shows that if you can spend the money than you can go from having an ageing squad to squad like chelsea's in just a couple of seasons. If things start going wrong than united will easily spend £100m+ to keep pace with the likes of chelsea and city,we will also see incrase in revenue of around £80m-£100m in the next two seasons so money is not going to be a problem but we 'need to copy chelsea's strategy of going for best young players and I dont think city have better squad than united's and with so many clubs funded by sugar daddies the appeal of signing for chelsea and city will decline........I don't necessarily think so. Chelsea have a very young team and all there star performers are in there early-mid 20's. City too have moved a lot of dead wood and older players and in the end FFP might not affect them if they continue to increase revenues and slowly lower there losses. United on the other hand need to replace, the likes of Vidic and Ferdinand in next few years and there best player is going to turn 30 next month.