I will get a lot of hate for saying against Bartra.
But:
-- Tito played Mascherano instead of him
-- Tata played Mascherano instead of him
-- now Lucho also plays Mascherano (and Pique, Mathieu, and he will probably play even Vermaelen when he will be ready) instead of him
Now, some people will say that it is only a coincidence and that coaches don't love him/rate him/trust in him that much.
But for example, when all coaches played Xavi and Iniesta before Fabregas, in turned out in the end that they were right. And Fabreags just wasn't good enough as those two, and the first two fitted much more to our system.
It is really indicative that all coaches pick not only regular defenders like Pique infront of Bartra, but even DMCs like Mascherano, all the time.
Again, maybe Bartra is not that good as people think.
Yes, he is from La Masia, he is the first La Masia defender since Puyol who could turn into something.
It seems that people are biased towards him because of that.
If he wasn't from La Masia, and if he was bought from a random French or Brasilian club at the age 22 or 23 for a small fee (to give us some depth, like Douglas currently), and if he would play equally as he is playing now, I doubt that the whole forum would asking: "Give him a chance, we need to play him no matter what. We just need to give him a chance to become a world-class defender with giving him a playing time in the first time. Even if we lose a lot of important points and matches because of him. We need to see how he will develop."
People would say that he is "meh, ok, or good" and nothing more.
If he plays, fine. If he doesn't play, fine again. People wouldn't care too much.
Again, if he wasn't from La Masia, people wouldn't act in this way.
Further, it seems that nobody is mentioning anymore a problem from the past when the papers were saying that he had huge problems with confidence.
At the end of the Season 2012/2013 under Tito, there were some stories that during a few matches he didn't want to play, that he was scared to enter the field, or how he asked to be subbed in the halftime even though we had no other available defenders and similar "mental" problems.
My point is: coaches know a lot more than we do.
We can only see a young, good guy, who is a La Masia product and he is everybody's favorite.
But it is hard to say if his skills are really that good and we don't know about his mental strength.
And playing won't solve all the mental problems.
Playing can solve some of his problems, but if he really has some problems, he will never be a naturally brave guy like Luis Enrique, Stoichkov, Puyol and other players.
Maybe there are some strong reasons (which we don't know) why he is always a 4th or 5th choice in our team, no matter who is on our rooster.