serghei
Senior Member
What is ability to do something? I mean football is a team sport. You are basically making the same argument that is used against Messi. "he can't win a WC".
I mean I can get it with Verratti since he is playing in France which isn't close to other top leagues and his performance in CL left a lot to be desired.But Suarez was already a top 3 striker in the world and he needed nothing to prove that time. He proved it in top 2 league and almost lead them to league title but he can't do it all by himself.
Also I won't take Verratti staying in PSG against him, he was 2nd division player when they purchased him, and to force his way out he had to stay underpaid for at least 3 years. No one is gonna make that sacrifice in a team spending zillions to win CL while living in Paris
PS: I think Kroos is overrated a bit,great player but his lack of defensive ability and he doesn't cover that much of ground either. Many RM fans I know get frustrated from him many times and I've yet to see any of them rate him above Modric.
I don't believe I am. When people say about Messi that he can't win a World Cup they are way too specific. I am not demanding specific things to consider players world class. Just that they confirm their ability at the highest level, that's it. I can understand why Suarez is considered world class by many people, for what he did at Liverpool and also at Uruguay, but for me, he needed that step that he made when he joined Barcelona to fully embrace that level of playing football consistently. EPL is not enough. Which is why I don't consider Kane to be word class as of now.
Ability to do something is about players who are capable of playing at a higher level but aren't at the moment because of different factors. Verratti can stay at PSG until he's 30 for all I care, it's just that Thiago Silva was a great talent at CB who was pretty much wasted at PSG for what should have been his peak years. Had he done differently, we could be talking in a different way about him.
Modric is more of a rounded midfielder, Kroos is more attacking and doesn't cover as much ground. The difference between a 6 and an 8. As far as passing is concerned, Kroos is the one from Madrid who swtiches up the play a lot with many diagonal balls. This is a great asset in Madrid's game, as they use the wings with Marcelo and Carvajal a lot, especially with Carvajal who plays like a more classic fullback, and has a great cross delivery when in space. A player like Kroos gives them quick access on the wings in one move. That's golden imo, and Kroos is the one who does that most. Having a player who can pass the ball with dead on accuracy with a great 60m. pass that lands 99% of the time right on the wing player's preffered foot spares you of 2-3 extra passes. That amount of time that you win by having a player with the passing range of Kroos is the difference in many cases. Imo he's just a supreme passer, and he has areas of his game where he even is superior to Modric. Kroos and Modric are a bit like Iniesta and Xavi.
Last edited: