I'm not talking about Iniesta at all here...
I'm talking about where you said you are yet to see Messi lose the ball more than 1 - 2 times a match, but in the CL final alone he lost it a lot.
Nonsence, his pass completion rate was about 85% (3rd highest behind Xavi and then Iniesta) and the majority of his dribbles ended in free kicks or a pass, he got tackled occasionally perhaps more than he usually does but that's not suprising against one of the top teams in the world.
Someone is taking this a little too seriously...
I don't think you fully understood my post, by no means am I a huge fan of English football or do I think performance against English sides is the measure for everything. It's just an interesting fact that he's been contained by those teams every single time. And no, they have never put 3 guys on him, to suggest anything like that is ludicrous.
@ "little Messi beating huge Ferdinand", he was nowhere near him. Epic marking fuckup if anything.
Well Messi hasn't "been contained by those teams every single time" against English sides. Infact that could only really be said about the two Chelsea legs of this year. Sure he hadn't scored against English sides till the Champions league Final (though when better to get that elusive goal?) but that's not to say he didn't come close on numerous occasions, set up other people's goals or performed well on his part which he had done against said 'top english sides' in the past.
And yes he does get marked redicusly by other teams moreso than Iniesta which was basically Jordzibob's point, yet more often than not it still doesn't stop Messi.
Well of course, he's a top player, but not quite as Iniesta in my opinion. Shakthtar and Sevilla? Cmon now. While Messi usually does great against Madrid, who tend to give him a shitload of space, he has struggled every single time against top English teams that take away space for his runs. This cannot be said for Iniesta.
Messi is marked tighter than Iniesta and usually plays further up the pitch which often gives him less space to work his magic in the way Iniesta can work his. I suppose Aletico Madrid don't count either than since there below the top two in Spain? Other than the fact they could have defeated Liverpool twice this season if not for Gerard diving in the box for a penalty and Aletico having perfectly good goals disallowed in the other game. Yet Barca tore them a new arsehole with Messi being the primary surgeon 3 times out of 4, and still performed well on an individual basis each time.
Here's a fact, Ronaldo has NEVER scored against Spanish opposition, i guess Spanish teams have him sussed then.
Meanwhile Messi has always had up and downs, his downs gladly haven't resulted in major loss, and his goods were mostly against Real and times he entered as sub.
Always had his up's and downs? The only downs he has is when he's injured and his ups have come against all sorts of teams from all over the world, he's schooled guys from France, Germany, Spain, England, Scotland, Portugal, Holland, Brazil, Argentina, Africa, America you name it he's made them look the fool at 21 years. Thats incredible (yes i know he's 22 now but he's not played any games since his birthday has he
).
To be honest people really are being too hard on Messi here which i feel is suprising.
The thing is, messi has been consistently good for so long, whereas iniesta has only really been this good for a season. In previous seasons he was brilliant, but there was no question whatsoever that messi was better. Iniesta was still learning. However this season it seems to have all come together for him. People are fickle when it comes to many things, and this is one of them. I dont mean that in a bad way, but lots of people like change. They're bored of saying messi is the best and now they can say iniesta is the best. But i only say that because i feel messi is better and cant see another reason for why iniesta is displacing messi as best player.
Couldn't agree more Maz.