No absolutely you don’t. But the two go together here. People know he is dirty and never batted an eyelid when it happened and I suspect a lot of it is because outside Madrid and some of United fanbase majority wanted Liverpool to succeed. Never even consider the possibility of it being an accident, don’t even look deep enough into a challenge so grey that referees don’t think he should have been booked. They just see what they want to see, assume they have all the evidence they need and when challenged they go “fuck off”. Just because he has history. And the correct thing to say about intent to injure in 90% of cases is “I don’t know”.
Think about it this way. Imagine if Ramos was notorious for doing high elbows while going up for headers and only some of minor portion them inadvertently resulted in fractured jaws. Would that be labelled as the “cunning strategy of Ramos to injure his opponents”? And what is the evidence that Ramos wanted to injure Salah? Armbar-like tangle leading to the opposite shoulder getting hurt? Lol. This is what that football justice warrior commenting above us is incapable of seeing for example.
It’s nice that guys like you are open to reflect though