I didn't like them. Not that they looked bad at all (except like being drawed by a 3 year old), but they didn't suit the kit design.
and still better than:They were drawn by Anna Vives, a graphic designer with Down syndrome.
Don't forget Bulbasaur. He turns into Venosaur eventually! But yeah it's usually between Charmander or Squirtle. You should get both.
They were drawn by Anna Vives, a graphic designer with Down syndrome.
Rosell (president): "This season's red-yellow shirt, based on the Catalan flag, is already the most sold away shirt in sports history."
Wow.
I want to see figures before I believe that. He might mean it's the most sold in the first month or whatever, can't imagine it is already above some other away shirts within weeks of release.
I want to see figures before I believe that. He might mean it's the most sold in the first month or whatever, can't imagine it is already above some other away shirts within weeks of release.
The away kit is a giant sucess. Deal with it.
What's your problem?
I like the new kits, both of them. But boards say shit like this ALL the time, just to make themselves look better. Also, recouping a full transfer fee with just shirt sales is ludicrous. You might be able to do it in 5 years or so, but clubs usually don't make insane amounts on kits. But the best thing about kits is that they are just walking ads for the club and companies involved. That's why clubs love selling kits, not the fact they would make 100 dollar per kit, because they don't.