[MENTION=22863]Laplacian[/MENTION]
I don't mind if his link-up play is not up to the level required.
No, I would not prefer him to link-up via one-twos etc, because that reminds me of something: Messi, Griezman, Coutinho, Pedri, and all others who have been used on the wing for Barca...
Always cutting centrally and congesting play down the middle...
When one of the fundamental problems with this team for years is the lack of width...
No Thanks
He only had 6 key passes come from his long ball/crosses (according to Opta data). So it is not high. His total chance created are only 39, not high either.
And he only has 29% of success crosses. So i'm not sure how he (that football data analyst) caculates his stats. Does Opta give him full data???
1) All analysts have subscriptions (or work for companies that have subscriptions) with either Opta or Statsbomb, which provide them with the entire data set
2) Key pass and chances created say little compared to xT.
Key pass is a pass that leads to a shot. If someone makes a simple short unmarked pass to a player next to him on the halfway line, and the latter takes a shot, that's registered as key pass. Is it significant? no!
Same problem with 'chances created'
On the contrary, the advantage of xT is that it
MEASURES precisely how much
increase of the potential threat (xG if a player were to take a shot from there) occurs when a player moves the ball from position A to position B either via a pass, OR via a ball carry.
such as a failed cross over the goal will look like more a threat than a through ball from defense/midfield.
I don't know why you still insist on this, after I explained 3 times already that the failed crosses do not enter the calculation of xT
Btw it is all expected threat.
Yes, that's why it's even more reflecting of the quality of the threat a player generates.
If a player makes successful crosses in the box and the stiker fucks them up, even by not taking a shot eventually, that does not take away anything from potential danger started by the creator
-> hence expected T