lessthanjake
New member
We should be more worried about absolute goal counts than accuracy ratios. If Villa scores more because he takes more shots, that should be totally fine. The fact that Pedro has taken only 32 shots is pretty illuminating. Either he's not putting himself in the scoring positions like he used to or the system dictates that most of the shots should come through another player.
It's a psychological game though. If a player hasn't scored in a long time (notice how minutes and games played are actually important), will he able to take chances with the same confidence and panache as he would were he taking more shots (hence in case of a good player scoring more goals) in general? In your example, those 38 shots for Ronaldo probably came in 2-3 games and with shots that come from all over the place and from free-kicks. They wouldn't affect his confidence in the same way. Hardly comparable to Pedro.
In addition, he isn't making those dangerous runs that would drag defenders like he used to, nor is he attacking his man like he used to.
I'm not complaining right now - because our results are close to perfection - but I wonder how we would react in the latter stages of say CL, when things are different.
I don't disagree with you. I certainly think the number of matches Pedro hasn't scored in likely hurts his confidence a lot despite the fact that the number of shots missed is not actually insanely high. It is definitely a concern. I was more just arguing that he hasn't been playing as badly as people are making it sound when they say "22 matches without a goal."
Obviously there's something to be said for the idea that a player might not be taking shots because his movement is awful so he is never in a position to get a pass to score. However, in truth, Pedro never really has taken many shots. In 2010-2011, he only took 1.57 shots a match. Interestingly, this season he is taking 1.57 shots a match too. I don't think he's actually getting himself in a position to score a whole lot less than before; he just was insanely clinical in past years, whereas he's in a pretty long drought now. I really think that's pretty much the only difference in his play now.
I don't think absolute goal counts are everything. The team can only create so many chances. The system is designed, more than ever, to manufacture those chances for Messi (and rightfully so). Pedro has always been a player to whom only the occasional chance will fall to, by design. In the past he has been really clinical with those chances. Currently, he has not been. That's the only difference. And I think it bears noting that this drought in his clinical-ness might be long in terms of matches and might really be hurting his confidence, but it's not THAT long in terms of shots missed in a row. As a result, I think it's hard to say he's hurting the team THAT much. He's not just missing endlessly, nor has he actually become more afraid to shoot than before.