JamDav1982
Senior Member
The point about Arsenal is in relation to "by far" best squad. Toure and Sterling aren't even in their best 11 now when fit. Santi and Coq and Alexis and Cech are all key players, and you can make cases for some of the others.
Again, Matuidi being poor is totally irrelevant. I debunked that. He is a key player regardless of a poor game.
It may have affected the players and manager, but as you said yourself, Pellers knew about it a full month before, it didn't show up in results.
The results post-announcement were largely as you'd expect (WON THE FIRST GAME POST ANNOUNCEMENT) especially with some key players missing, and you won't even acknowledge it. You won't even acknowledge how little there was in the difference in league position, literally one game between 2nd and 4th!
What have Arsenal won when these players have been fit?
Sterling would start most of the time when fit. Toures head has gone a bit since Pep announced as I said.
Once again missing the Matuidi point.....he played half the tie when PSG couldnt beat Man City at home. When yes he was really poor and made little difference.
What is your Pellegrini point? I am saying it affected the players and he says the same but you seem to think he is lying about that.
Literally one game....but still second and the manager believes it impacted the players and you dont. Fair play. You know better.