footyfan
Calma, calma
a)Because this only affects the top3.
Barca/real are many points from the third most of the times. That doesn't mean that the league is less competitive in lower tiers.
In fact, the battle for the europe slots is much more competitive than bpl's as evidenced by the results between these teams in europa league.
b)This is a false point in the last 2 seasons, atletico won it last season in the very last match day and it got played out till the 2 last matches this season too. While in england man.c and chelsea won it easily.
c)You also referenced the number of goals, as a measure of competitiveness. Yet when I say that they would score as much in the bpl, you agree, so, why did you lie in the first place?
I think we have different definitions for competitive. You are using competitive as in better. I'm using competitive as in the teams are closely matched.
a) I don't get what you're saying. With 1 game left, there are 3 teams fighting for the Europa league spot - Liverpool, Spurs and Southampton. That is what competitive means imo. How they actually perform in the Europa League has nothing to do with how competitive that Europa League spot in the EPL is.
b) Man City also won it on the last day last season. Yes, Chelsea have won it quite easily this season and Barca have not. I will concede the title race was much more competitive in La Liga than EPL this season. But that still doesn't erase that Barca have 6 more points than Chelsea at this stage and a +88 goal difference as compared to +42. Their games against the other teams in La Liga are less competitive, because the teams are matched closer in the EPL than La Liga.
c) My whole point is that Barca and Real are making La Liga uncompetitive, and they're not in the EPL - they're in La Liga. What don't you understand, and where did I lie?