Real Madrid (old thread)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Moe

powered by;
cant say anything against that. hypocrisy in this forum is quite obvious but come on, its fun at times.

regarding Ozil I dont think that Barca need him either, but wouldnt he be perfect for Real Madrid in case the sale of Kaka/VDV?
 

Metaphysical

Bomb Dropper
433 doesn't have wingers.

451 has wingers. 4231 has wingers.

433 has wing-forwards/wide-forwards/inside-forwards.

josé doesn't play 433, he plays 451 which can change into a 433 when attacking (with the wingers coming infield). primarily his chelsea team lined up 451. inter started off 4312 but on the big occasions he returned to his 451. you could argue it was 4231 given the attacking license given to sneijder, but it was never 433 apart from the first half at stamford bridge.

kaka fits into any formation which gives him the ball around 30/40 yards from goal with about 10 yards of space in-front of him (or plays on the counter, passing to him as he runs into space behind a defence).
 

Beast

The Observer
Agree Moe

but it was never 433 apart from the first half at stamford bridge.

josé doesn't play 433
433 has wing-forwards/wide-forwards/inside-forwards.
Decide ffs ;)
4-3-3 with Robben-Duff neither are wing forwards just wingers and not wide forwards or inside forwards and that first half is half of his time in Chelsea till he sold Duff (more or less )
which contradict with the "he doesn't play 4-3-3 *
and F.Y.I 4-3-3 wasn't invented by Barca , the original standard 4-3-3 based on two wingers and one striker , just because you "Barca" use inside forward doesn't make it the "Standard 4-3-3 " in the world of football , it's the exception to the formation but not the formation
 
Last edited:

Metaphysical

Bomb Dropper
Decide ffs ;)

don't take things out of context and order ffs ;)

4-3-3 with Robben-Duff neither are wing forwards just wingers and not wide forwards or inside forwards and that first half is half of his time in Chelsea till he sold Duff (more or less )
which contradict with the "he doesn't play 4-3-3 *

chelsea played 451 which shifted to 433 in attack.

without the ball they were a 451 (or a 4141 if you wanna be technical) with duff and robben/cole playing as proper wide-midfield wingers. with the ball they came forward into a 433 (or a 4231), but they always lined up 451 without the ball. that was their primary formation. united play a similar style now with valencia and nani wide and rooney as the lone striker.

and F.Y.I 4-3-3 wasn't invented by Barca , the original standard 4-3-3 based on two wingers and one striker , just because you "Barca" use inside forward doesn't make it the "Standard 4-3-3 " in the world of football , it's the exception to the formation but not the formation

I'm well aware we didn't invent 433.

but for me the difference between 433 and 451 is that in a 433 the wide-forwards don't track back that far. they are forwards and they stay closer to the final third of the pitch. not only does this put them closer to goal but it keeps the opponent's fullbacks pinned back in their half. this is what inter did to chelsea at the bridge. unlike later games where eto'o and pandev played as wingers in a 451/4231, at the bridge, for the first half, they played as forwards. they attacked, they didn't track back that often and stayed up there, pinning cashley and ivanovic back and robbing chelsea of their width.
 

Beast

The Observer
No Meta you are wrong

4-5-1 is
---------------DM----------------
RM------CM-------CM--------LM
4-2-3-1
-------------DM----DM----------
RM-------------AM----------LM
4-3-3
--------------Midfield-------------
RW------------CF-----------LW
now when you have Robben and Duff pure wingers not RM/LM you are playing 4-3-3 , you want to call is 4-1-2-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 it's your thing but whoever made the 4-3-3 when Brazil start
4-3-3.gif
 

Metaphysical

Bomb Dropper
No Meta you are wrong

4-5-1 is
---------------DM----------------
RM------CM-------CM--------LM
4-2-3-1
-------------DM----DM----------
RM-------------AM----------LM
4-3-3
--------------Midfield-------------
RW------------CF-----------LW
now when you have Robben and Duff pure wingers not RM/LM you are playing 4-3-3 , you want to call is 4-1-2-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 it's your thing but whoever made the 4-3-3 when Brazil start
4-3-3.gif

so you got a graphic from wikipedia, what does that mean?

whatever dude, this is a completely banal argument.
 

barcetia

Mikrofonkåt
yeah, no team plays 4-3-3 as in a player moves exactly as it says in paper.
for example people say we play a 4-3-3, but i'd say that it's sometimes a 4-1-2-1-2(busi defensive duties, messi drives into the middle) and sometimes a 3-5-2(dani pushes forward like never b4) etc etc..
 

Beast

The Observer
It means i got the first graphic i found available.. easy

Is the BBC good enough for you ?
_41705434_4_3_3_416.gif


or this ?

4-3-3-FLAT-thumbnail.jpg


every 10 year old know the 4-3-3 is based on 2 wingers and a striker
 

Nándor

New member
lass, m. diarra & drenthe are top of the list to leave, followed by gago & VdV, depending on the circumstances. gago depending on how many CMs/DMs join and VdV on the money offered.

AS "confirms" these names apart from gago plus the obvious raul & guti.

- drenthe: germany or portugal
- lass: no destination named
- diarra: newcastle, ewerton & aston villa are named
- VDV: bayern munich
- raul: most likely schalke 04
- guti: most likely besiktas
 

JCCR_FCB

Barcelona, a Cidade Condal
Jeez, its been a long day. I was wondering for a minute who besat was

Yeah... man, it's the age... that don't forgive us... sorry Beast!

It means i got the first graphic i found available.. easy

Is the BBC good enough for you ?
_41705434_4_3_3_416.gif


or this ?

4-3-3-FLAT-thumbnail.jpg


every 10 year old know the 4-3-3 is based on 2 wingers and a striker

Even better... I like grafics... excelent... Mourinho also like grafics...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Home of Barca Fans

Top