Sorin
Well-known member
Absolutely for me.
This is the problem with 3-4-3 and 3-5-2 imo. With a 4-3-3, the wings are done by pairs. RW/LW + RB/LB. So in this sense, fullbacks go really high up in a controlled manner, usually when the winger makes an inside run and leaves space open for an outside overlap. In moments where you have control.
But with systems where width is ensured on both ends by the fullbacks because everybody else plays narrow, everything on the wings is hugely, HUGELY dependent on the engine and the performance of the fullbacks. Fucking, hell, not even in the age of peak Alves the 3 at the back didn't work, under fucking Guardiola.
Tremendous tactical fuck-up. Here, this is before the goal.
It's simple really. Alba goes up because without fullbacks very high, you have no width in attack, Benzema goes wide to exploit the space available wide, you see Valverde picking up and pinning a defender (Lenglet), and then the Madrid fullback pushes up in space, with absolutely no-one to block him. Because well, your only wide players are caught up. Notice how huge the distance between Alba and Vazquez is.
It's naive by Koeman. 3 at the back doesn't work against team with the ability to switch the play on the wings quickly. They will find a motherload of space whenever they win a 1 vs 1 or whenever they switch the play fast.
Spot on, their 4-3-3 countered our 3-5-2 perfectly. It works when you play against the likes of Betis but against the top teams it gets found out real fast. I mean, I can't remember a team who employed such tactics being successful for long. Just Chelsea under Conte and that for a year and they flopped big time in the CL.