Blinkfloyd
New member
If you had taken 5 seconds to read the article and another 5 seconds to think about the article you would maybe not post the article.
Yes it is very obvious that football will be more and more physical - as it will be more and more technical and more and more psychological. It improves naturally, in all aspects. And yes it is true that Klopps gegenpressing came in style 10 years ago and somewhat was able to counter Peps more control based game for a while. It is also true that in the early 2000s there was the exact same talk about the future players being 185cm+ minimum and physique becoming more important, we saw what happened then with Barcelona and Spain, they destroyed football.
Football is both a bit cyclical, and a bit rock-paper-scissor. Barcelonas style since long is about controlling the ball and the game, they should continue to build on that style the best they can, and not try and follow the cycles manically in order to compete with other clubs better suited for other styles. Busquets' style and class is still great and very much good enough for both Barcelona and Spain, and he should not be auto-blamed the few times this team lose.
True. Busquets is not one take all the blame.
Physicality and Technical skills go hand in hand until limits of human body are reached.
The issue is that in football , physicality has long taken a 2nd position. However going forward a minimum standard would be required similar to military recruitment and training.
They are 2 parallel streams . A stronger footballer is a better footballer maybe it will also help unlock their full potential.
A stronger footballer is faster , can jump higher , kick harder. Now you take these improvements and go back to how you can use that to play better football.
Mark rippetoe the author of starting strength has talked extensively about this.
Strength training is universal and should not be mixed with sport specific training.