Is this true?
If it's common practice for officials to receive money from clubs, then it's a regulations problem.
He also owned 15% of the clubs shares at the time. Yep, no conflict of interests.
Is this true?
If it's common practice for officials to receive money from clubs, then it's a regulations problem.
He also owned 15% of the clubs shares at the time. Yep, no conflict of interests.
Who cares really it doesnt have any baring on Barca other than makes him look a hypocrite if neither did anything wrong.
This is a public battle even more than a legal case. So, it matters.
Depends on how conflict of interest is defined. It's a gray area so to speak. If you trust officials to receive money from private services... it's not illegal. It all depends on what the law says in this case.
Conflict of interest can be defined differently in different countries.
La Liga is also a private entity probably... so it's probably legal to own a position inside La Liga and also run a private business in parallel.
Nothing will come if this unless eufa wanna be dicks, but domestically we should be find I think, but it's definitely a bad look.
We know Madrid is doing worst, but as per usual their a much smarter club than us, should have spent that money to reveal their even deeds, maybe find out who their voodoo man is.
Considering he is threatening to sue them, did you expect anything different?Did laporta speech made things worse? I see bad receptions from reporters!!??