isn't Malcom the younger version of willian but with more potential? so why not just go for him
A honest question, I mean I get it to some point, but who decides this "potential" part?
Who has measured Dembele's potential so that we can say that he has more potential than a current Willian, even though I can understand where this idea is coming from in Dembele's case.
But for example, Malcom, it is quite brave to say that a kid like him has more potential than Willian, currently the best player of a Brazilian NT team which could easily end as world champions.
So, one guy plays for Bordeaux, but has "a potential".
Never played a big game, never played in a Champions league, never played an NT match, never played on a World cup, never was a key player in a big team in big matches.
The other guy could turn into a World cup winner in 10 days, being a key playmaker.
Whom to buy between those two, hmm?
I know that a word "potential" is by far the most valuable thing in football on our forum, but we need to calm down a little...