I mean Xavi himself got this job because of nepotism.
That's different. He has been a mastermind on the field for Barca in its best run in history. Obviously he has a pull, especially from likes of Laporta, who was at the center of that golden age. It's a gamble, but justified one, when it comes to inviting him as a coach. Pep was actually more of a gamble as he was nowhere near as influential as a player in his time. That's NOT nepotism. Nepotism is, when you put your family members, close friends and tribesman in key positions regardless of their ability.
I think a lot of coaches are so awestruck with Busi in possession that they don't like benching him. Must be those smooth turns and the press resistance.
Unfortunately, they just see him as the permanent pinnacle of the DM position in their ideal system of play.
Agree in the later point as both Spain and Barca are so adamant on their "style" of play. Disagree on press resistance. He has deteriorated heavily in this aspect and also not as good of a passer in recent years. He's defensive abilities weren't great even in his hay days, but now he's completely impotent as a defensive mid. Only the "quarterback" shit.
It's true but have you seen Spain play without Busi? They look clueless. Maybe too reliant on him? Especially in offense.
I remember seeing Spain couple of matches with Rodri as a main mid man and they looked great. Rodri isn't as 'nuanced' in his turns and sudden between the line passing, but he's all around better player with youth, pace and physique that Busi simple doesn't have anymore. I'd feel much safer for Spain NT with Rodri than with Busquets. Remember the Croatia game. Spain should have lost it, if not for missed chances by croats, unlikely wonder goal by Morata and a bit sneaky shit they pulled off with the drinking pause. Everything croats created made through the center, where Busquets was supposed to help defense. He was absent as usual.