For anyone interested in understanding basic moves where ETH outsmarted Xavi.
The difference when you have an elite coach is that even moves that look crazy (playing Worghost as a CAM) have a logic behind them and yield results...
If he had his way without doubt he plays the exact same 11 as vs Madrid. But it is not that simple if you look at the big picture. The schedule is insane and the squad is short.
Vaduz more important game
Ferran is totally useless. I am so surprised that Xavi did not realize it yet. Tbh, I should not be surprised.I think we should be giving Fati and Ferran more opportunities, and against Cadiz would therefore be a perfect chance to rotate.
Fact is, Busquets, Gavi and Pedri have all played too much. Hence the injuries.
How many minutes has Christensen played this season vs Busquets or Pedri?
Yet Christensen was the one who was sacrificed.
Even Raphinia was so hungry when he saw that is subbed. For sure, everybody noticed his angry including the brothers Hernandez. You take out Raphinia and bring in NOBODY ( fuck Torres). Xavi is out of mind?Not only that, he subbed off our only threat in Raphinha or was he resting him for Cadiz?
Literally braindead
Even Raphinia was so hungry when he saw that is subbed. For sure, everybody noticed his angry including the brothers Hernandez. You take out Raphinia and bring in NOBODY ( fuck Torres). Xavi is out of mind?
May have missed on Ten Hag?. He definitely out coached Xavi today? even though Xavi shot himself in the foot.
Dembele has 8 goals and 7 assists (15 G + A) in 1,862 minutes this season
https://www.transfermarkt.us/ousmane-dembele/leistungsdaten/spieler/288230
Raphinha has 7 goals and 9 assists (16 G + A) in 1,672 minutes this season
https://www.transfermarkt.us/raphinha/leistungsdaten/spieler/411295
Dembele is DEFINITELY a better player than Raphinha (before you all lose your minds) but the Dembele stans are making him seem like he had the production of prime Messi. Calma
Working for one of the top pharmas/biotechs in the world these days, incidentally under the umbrella (broadly) of data science. My academic background is known around these parts in the COVID threads from several years ago. So, I would say I know a thing or two. My main issue with you, if we're being serious, is you are essentially the antithesis of what a person who applies statistics should do. You don't state/ question assumptions made in the methodology and you're entirely far too confident in your conclusions. To the point of being arrogant. Ask any serious statistician, and unilaterally you'll hear: Interpret with caution/context.
Your assertion is there is no difference in value between off an on target shots. What you then proceed to do is provide an edge case scenario. Would you agree, that in expectation (on average), on target shots are more valuable than off target shots. Because the vast majority of off-target shots aren't "ones skyrocketed from in front of an empty net".
Notice how this relates to my above point. Too arrogant, not critical thinking enough.
Played Araujo on RB to protect from Rushford only to ten Hag deploying Rushford on the other side.
Needs a lot to learn.