I guess you didn't log to many forums during VV days and missed the whole "Valdes is better for Barca than Buffon because of his passing" days.
Zubi btw always spoke proudly about how Cruijff told him to play well with his leg and attacks starts with him.
I don't like this discussion either but the club actually won 5CL titles with GK who were all known for passing someway or another.
We are taking it to a new level with MATS b/c his passing skills is probably the best,and actually I think he is on same level as Valdes as a GK.
That said I will gladly trade him with DDG. just can't see it happening without major financial loss.
Ok, but again there are 100s of variations between:
1. a Gk who can't do anything with his feet
2. and Mats
Valdes was good with feet, but nothing spectacular imo.
Bravo was decent with feet, but nowhere near Mats.
My point is that even a few Months ago, on Mats' and Bravo's threads we could have read 100s of posts how Mats is a better fit because he is better in passing.
It seems that a time will prove that Bravo was a much better fit because he was actually a much better keeper in terms of conceding less goals, creating less conceded goals out of nothing etc.
I know that people don't like numbers, but still, imo:
Bravo was 7/10 with feet and 10/10 as a Gk.
Mats is currently at 10/10 with feet and at 8/10 in goalkeeping.
My point: a Gk who is 10/10 in goalkeeping (and anything with 6/10 or higher with feet) will always be a better fit for us than a Gk with 8/10 in goalkeeping, no matter how good he is with feet.
A somewhat exaggerated analogy would be:
Barca can have a Fc who can score 50 goals per season, but who doesn't defend too well.
Or we can have a Fc who scores 20 goals per season, but he runs 20 kms per match and usually has 7 tackles won per match and 6 interceptions.
I mean, that's nice, but we need a Fc who will bang 50 goals per season.
Fcs should score and defenders should make tackles.
This is exaggerated, but ok.
If Mats would have been as good in goalkeeping as this forum wanted, then we would really have a real gem in our team: a 10/10 good Gk with the best passing in the world.
But in reality, we just have a very good passer, who creates too many dangerous situations due to being too arrogant and due to defenders relying on his passing skills too much. And he is quite meh in goalkeeping till now.
As others have mentioned, it is quite hard to remember (except an away match to Bayern), when was the last time when he actually saved our asses and when he was a gamechanger factor.
Any younger GK talent out of Germany? [MENTION=19371]Yannik[/MENTION]?
Historically, Barca and German keepers didn't click till now.
We had Enke, and now Mats.
Our last 4 good keepers were 3 "Latinos" (2 Spanish guys) Zubi and Valdes, Chillean Bravo and only one non-Latino: Dutch Ruud Hesp in late 90s.
So, history says that Spanish or Latino keepers fit the best for our style.
They seem to know the language, culture, climate and everything better. Plus, they click better with teammates, it seems.
On paper, De Gea currently looks like the best option by far.
Spanish, knows the language, climate, La liga experience, good with feet (lol), young, already experienced at the highest level.