Sure, like any other player on this planet, Messi is fully capable of being shut down by others, especially when facing tough opponents. After all, he is only human, and that's what I like about him.
Actually, I've heard some Messi-critics accusing him of disappearing/becoming invisible in important games. Is there any truth to that? Does anybody have stats on Messi's performance against premium, CL level teams?
It's all started on Villa thread
Someone posted Villa pwned by Thiago Silva, then others reply Messi isnt, others add Messi is exception, others add Messi is out of this world, then I remind about Messi vs Bayern.
And here I am now, debate on about Messi's injury made him had a bad game vs Bayern.
I remember Nesta shutting him down, when he was fully fit. Also Varane, more recently.
What team do you support?I don't buy into all the Messi hype ( I don't think he's the best ever like many claim) but to be fair, messi has been the only threat in attack for barca for the last and the season before that. It's impossible for Messi not to be owned by defenders (Verane, Nesta, Ramos, Pepe) when he's pretty much on his own. If Messi had etoo and henry( at their best) beside him or at least some top forwards unlike Pedro or Sanchez, there is no way defenders would be able to concentrate on marking Messi all the time and therefore Messi would have more space and less pressure on him.
It doesn't help that only iniesta is an attacking midfielder whereas Xavi and Busquets have little to offer in attack.
What team do you support?
I don't buy into all the Messi hype ( I don't think he's the best ever like many claim) but to be fair, messi has been the only threat in attack for barca for the last and the season before that. It's impossible for Messi not to be owned by defenders (Verane, Nesta, Ramos, Pepe) when he's pretty much on his own. If Messi had etoo and henry( at their best) beside him or at least some top forwards unlike Pedro or Sanchez, there is no way defenders would be able to concentrate on marking Messi all the time and therefore Messi would have more space and less pressure on him.
It doesn't help that only iniesta is an attacking midfielder whereas Xavi and Busquets have little to offer in attack.
Can it still be called hype though? even if you dont consider him the best ever, (which is possible of course) doesnt mean he is hyped at this point, all credit is justified by his accomplishments, he isnt Neymar or hyped like Becks was.
Football fans sometimes have this "past legends are better no matter what" approach just like boxing fans, a lot of hear say.
To each his own though of course