Ok, it is offtopic, but please, enlighten me, how do we measure a success of a certain player?
For me, personally, a player has improved a team if you can see a difference in results, trophies. Or in worst case, in displays on a field, but that is very subjective, since, you see, some thinks that Dembele is our 2nd best player already (because he has nice dribbling skills, while others will keep him on the bench and play EV's 442).
In 4 years BEFORE Neymar:
Before Neymar: 3 La Liga titles in 4 years
With Neymar: 2 La Liga titles in 4 years
Champions league:
Before Neymar: 1 title in 4 years
With Neymar: 1 title in 4 years
CDR:
Before Neymar: 3 titles in 4 years
With Neymar: 3 titles in 4 years
I could add: after Neymar.
This team, with Messi, will win at least 2 La ligas in 4 years, and there is a nice chance that we will win 1 CL in 4 years.
So, we will be again be THE SAME without Neymar, or who knows, maybe even more successful than with him.
Now, if you compare a team, BEFORE a player, DURING his time here, and AFTER his departure, and if results are more or less the same all the time (or even better when he is not here), can you explain to me: what to think then?
I know that there are 100s of variables.
But still, Barca wasn't weaker BEFORE Neymar than with him, and we aren't weaker TODAY without him, than with him.
So, instead of saying: Neymar wasn't a success here, I will say:
He didn't raise our game to a higher level, as we expected when we bought him.
And Barca is more or less, equally as successfull, with or without him in our team.
I mean, when we bought him, the idea wasn't: to stay equally as good or to turn into a weaker team, but to improve our team, right?
On the other hand, remove Messi from our team, and you'll see a huge drop in results.
And please don't reply: we sucked during Neymar because of Lucho.
If you reply this, I surely won't reply to that kind of replies.
During Neymar we sucked, well, because of Neymar.