Mitchell1978
Senior Member
He wasn't even starting ahead of Daniel van Buyten in the World Cup and now we're paying 15-20 mil for him?
normally he would but he was injured and lacked matchfitness
He wasn't even starting ahead of Daniel van Buyten in the World Cup and now we're paying 15-20 mil for him?
Who knows, maybe he'll fail his medical arty1:Deal on Vermaelen is not yet done, teams still talking, but Barcelona expect to close it in the coming days, possibly this weekend. [rac1]
Dat big name centre back Dat immense defensive improvement Dat cheap transfer fee
Glad they kept they promised... poor signing. I'm not entertained.
Because very few CBs fit the "Barca profile" (or so I've heard)We have a big problem in defense for years, everyone see it, everyone knows it. Of course you must not be a soccer expert to note that, even those who do not understand a shit of soccer has noticed that, even a blind man would see this problem. In the soccer world, everyone knows that Barcelona has a big problem in defense for years.
Then why, why our board does not put this on priority 1 ?
They bought the best defenders available. What do you want?
Agreed about that Mathieu was the best option for backup CB, but Vermaelen the best option to be our starting CB? Regardless of his quality, how can a player with such an injury-record be considered the best option available?They bought the best defenders available. What do you want?
Because very few CBs fit the "Barca profile" (or so I've heard)
It's weird that we didn't make a move for Balanta indeed. I know he's third-party owned, but Valencia only payed 6,5M if I remember correctly, so his full price is probably not more than 15M?Laporte/Balanta and either Hummels/Benatia/I.Martinez would have been my list. Instead we wasted half the summer annoying PSG for nothing.