Mateka
New member
Why no Haaland if Torres came? They fee for the transfer is only about ~?10m/year for 5 years.
That pays for Raiola.
Why no Haaland if Torres came? They fee for the transfer is only about ~?10m/year for 5 years.
That pays for Raiola.
Hype is there as he is Catalan and young but who knows. It's all about the system anyway. Pedro under pep came out of nowhere and proved to be an asset.
Hype is there as he is Catalan and young but who knows. It's all about the system anyway. Pedro under pep came out of nowhere and proved to be an asset.
He's not Catalan.
I wil give him 1-2 years till he is gone. When was the last time spain had great strikers? . They do produce great midfielders but when it depends on strikers nohting. I think david villa was the last decent one.
Yeah I gotta think this signing means no Haaland. Regardless I hope he pans out. As with all transfers these days none are a sure thing.
I am not really a fan of his transfer. But don't understand this talk about Ferran Torres being a striker.
The guy hasn't proved anything in his career that warrants playing him as a 9. Even if you watch his highlights he isn't better than Morata at 9.
People loosing their minds with all these comparisons with Fernando Torres or Eto'o. Shit takes after shit takes.
PS : David Villa was worlds apart from Ferran when it comes to being a striker
He was being trained to be a 9 by Pep, and he was showing good signs there during this season. He's only 21, if he keeps training in that position he'll be an excellent striker but we'll see if Xavi wants him as that or as a winger.