A great finisher doesn't mean he's a good penalty taker. Using that very logic, Messi is a great penalty taker.
A prerequisite for a No. 9 isn't taking penalties. A proper No. 9 is a lethal finisher, and a pain for defenders through movement and constant pressure, atleast in Barcelona.
Again, please explain how. I mean, we don't just look at the meagre sample size of penalties of a player in Barcelona to justify that they should be a penalty taker. That's mere madness statistically. I mean using that type of logic means that Xavi is a great penalty taker with a 100% conversion rate.
__
Suarez in his career has taken
33 penalties.
Scored 27.
Missed 6.
So, that's an 81.8% conversion rate.
Messi in his career has taken
82 penalties.
Scored 65.
Missed 17.
So, there's an 79.2% conversion rate.
Now, note the fact that Messi has taken WAY more penalties than Suarez, and the only time Suarez has been a regular penalty taker was back in 2009-10, when he was playing for Ajax. Suarez hasn't been a club's penalty taker since Ajax.
I fail to see how you can prove it properly to me that Suarez should take penalties. He isn't definitely
that much better than Messi in taking penalties, taking into account that in the same time he has taken way less penalties. And this doesn't even take into account how the dressing room would blow up due to this undue tension.
__
All in all, I'm not here trying to be a Messi fanboy, trying to prove that he's the best blah blah. I'm just saying that they both aren't that great at penalties. And between them, Messi should take them due to his experience, and the fact that he has the balls to take the big penalties after the Chelsea debacle. (watch his penalties with Argentina for example.)
If there is someone significantly better than either of them, I'd understand asking that person to be the penalty taker of the team. But there isn't anyone, is there?