What a rediculous thing to say. Suarez outscored pre-injury Ronaldo at Ajax. A more suitable question would be what would pre-injury Ronaldo have done in England at a club like Liverpool? Probably become injured that much sooner. Few seem to realize the sacrifices that Suarez makes to his natural game in order to make Barca the best TEAM in the world. Barca are undefeated when Suarez scores 34-2-0. How is pre-injury Ronaldo's record in that regard? How is Neymar's record? Would pre-injury Ronaldo been able to tame his ego enough to play with Messi? The fact that Suarez is doing these things NOW, when several great players have failed is something that won't fully be appreciated until he is gone. In most every big game Barca have had in the past two seasons, Suarez has been THE difference maker. Let that sink in. Fact is that if Suarez was Brazilian, the comparisons would only be vs Pele.
Eredivise was a joke league at the time of Suarez, at the time of R9, was one the best in the world, with the Dutch team winning the champions league. And Suarez scored more, just because he played more, so i don't see the point. Comparing the Serie A of 90s with the premier league of today is crazy. There are not close in terms of quality and defense were much better in serie A both individually and tactically. who is the best defender in premier league? Kompany? in the serie of that time in a team like Parma, playing two monsters like Cannavaro and Thuram.
The inter Ronaldo was even worse in terms of quality than the liverpool of Suarez, their best player after Ronaldo, was Djorkaeff. without mentioning the fact that Ronaldo has done those things from 17 to 23years, already best player in the world at 19. Suarez before the 2013-2014 season was considered less than Cavani
However i think that the players can be compared only in their time, because we don't know what they would do in other times. An historian never compare the generals of different eras, it's anti-historical. you'll never see in a story book that Alxander is better than Caesar. For example Messi in 70s It would not have been even a football player, because there were not the GH. R9 today probably would not have had the injuries that had in 90s because the medicine has improved and in the 90s players tended to be pumped muscularly. Another example Del Piero, that time considered the best in the world after Ronaldo and it had similar injuries. Without considering the different teams, Ronaldo never played in a team so good and organizzated, Real Madrid of Perez is a circus, they have the names but the team is always unbalanced, especially if you sold makelele and buy Beckham to put him as a Cdm, and play with Pavones in defense. Today, Perez has done a similar thing. has sold Alonso and Di maria, to put 3 cam in the midfiled. The only thing that we can compare the players are their technical and physical skills.
this mean that for Messi is not the best ever, beacuse simple not exists the best ever, only comparisons to entertain people, but there is no objective analysis that can determine it. We can only imagine what Maradona could have do if he had grown in Masia, while we don't know if Messi would have been a football player, in the 80s, we can only compare their skills, and this will change over the time.
)
