Again, i don't see the arguments in your case about Alonso or Cambiasso that you expect from me. You just say: "he is the best player, he is incredible for his team. He is more important than Iniesta."
That's it. I don't see numbers that don't lie? I don't see arguments. You say he is important and incredible. And you also say we can't do that for Iniesta. Bit sucky, no?
Even bloody thierry14Henry puts up a better case for Ronaldo. You are the one that is complaining about the discussions on this forum but you don't make an effort yourself.
Iniesta?
- he can keep possession
- he can create danger with his dribbles
- he can create a chance for someone else with his immense passing
- he has that great accelaration while his ball is glued to his feet which can switch the game from our own box to the other box in a few seconds without losing possession
- he gets fouled numerous times in a game (that there is no end product is not his fault, so don't blame him. free kick is in se always dangerous)
- he works and runs for the team in a way that few attack minded midfielders would do
- his inspired football motivates and inspires the team
- he has a decent (i don't say perfect or very good) shot but he is just unlucky in his finish (he hit the post several times this season) Let's say he is capable of delivering dangerous shots, not like Hleb or so.
Those are a few reasons why i would pick him. I also don't get the comparison between Cambiasso or Alonso and Iniesta. Why would you pick defensive midfielders over an attacking one. You should compare Gerrard, Lampard with Iniesta.
I think Gerrard and Lampard have the advantage of their physique and shot, but Iniesta makes up with his dribbling and passing skills.