Arda Turan

Ghostmaster

Ghostmaster

Danger Ahead
If Fifa won't allow us to register Arda we could still sign a free agent, let's see who is available - Ronaldihno, Adebayor, Anelka... possibilities are endless...
 
M

Morten

Senior Member
Ghostmaster said:
If Fifa won't allow us to register Arda we could still sign a free agent, let's see who is available - Ronaldihno, Adebayor, Anelka... possibilities are endless...
Click to expand...

Dont think any of those can make a difference, dont think they will do much at all, in fact. Well, Adebayor could be a solid backup, problem is that he is a lazy idiot, only playing well when he have to, contract reniewal situations etc.
 
Galning

Galning

Moderator
FIFA are trying the ignore and let's hope it goes away tactic. A bit like what Barça did when they threatened to ban our canteranos.
 
xXKonan

xXKonan

Senior Member
http://www.sport.es/es/noticias/barca/csd-podria-dar-soporte-barca-caso-arda-turan-4554401

The question alluded to by Cardinal is referring to the decision of Barcelona to ask the Royal Spanish Football Federation to register the former player of Atletico Madrid for the injured Rafinha to play games Cup and League.

The response from FIFA to that hypothesis was that the rules of the RFEF "might conflict" with the rules governing these situations and therefore claimed the Barcelona football's governing body to "the need for precision in his reply in a affirmative or negative sense. "

For Cardinal, that says "knowing" the subject, "the fact is based on possible inconsistency between the rules of the RFEF and FIFA."

"Precisely this possibility of an initial decision own FC Barcelona . I'd like to emphasize two messages. It would be good, and it is a task for sports soccer authorities as the RFEF, that its regulations are coordinated with those of the FIFA. There can not be different and they give rise to disputes as has happened in the past, "said Cardinal.

"Then there is our commitment to the defense of the Spanish legislation. The decision has to take the Barcelona and if you choose to assert their rights in a certain way, it is he who gets to make this decision," said the president of CSD , which he was cautious in discussing this issue.

"It is a legal issue and would have to study it in detail and learn the details. It's a FIFA punishment which neither the CSD and the Spanish Administration was part. We do not know the ends and details, "he confessed.

"What we advocate is the Spanish legislation and the application of the Spanish legislation. The hypothesis of the one part, that's what I do not want to pronounce now is that the Spanish legislation would favor the interests of Barcelona . If so , have not the slightest doubt in supporting the Spanish legislation is fulfilled, "he said.
Click to expand...
Not the Greatest Translation but here's what the Article says.
 
Last edited:
F

Flavia

Guest
xXKonan said:
http://www.sport.es/es/noticias/barca/csd-podria-dar-soporte-barca-caso-arda-turan-4554401
Click to expand...

There's that news in english too:

http://www.sport-english.com/en/news/barca/csd-could-support-barcelona-arda-turan-case-4555440

Backing
CSD could support Barcelona in Arda Turan case
The goverment's commitment is to Spanish law, not FIFA penalties



Sport EN | 1.10.2015 | 20:47h.

Miguel Cardenal, president of the Superior Council of Sports, was cautious regarding the possibility that Barcelona can enroll Arda Turan, saying it is "a legal issue and must be studied in detail" and said that the penalty suffered by the Catalan team is from FIFA, and their commitment is to Spanish law.

The question alluded to by Cardenal refers to Barcelona's decision to request the Royal Spanish Football Federation register the former Atletico Madrid player for the injured Rafinha, to play games in the league and cup.

FIFA's response to that hypothesis was that the rules of the RFEF "might conflict" with the regulations governing such situations and thus the Barcelona called on the governing body of football, demanding "the need for precision in a reply in a affirmative or negative sense."

Cardenal said: "It's based on possible inconsistency between the rules of the RFEF and FIFA.

"It's a decision that Barcelona have to take and they must decide if they want to exercise their rights to move forward. It's a legal matter that needs to be studied.

"It's a ban by FIFA that neither the CSD nor the Spanish administration has been part of and we don't know the precise details.

"We defend the Spanish legal system and the application of Spanish laws. The hypothesis here is just the balance is in favour of Barcelona's interests and if they do take it forward, we would not have a doubt over supporting them."
 
xXKonan

xXKonan

Senior Member
Barcelona expect to get final and clear answer from Fifa on request for information on registration of Arda at beginning of next week. [md]

In the end we will probably take it up to the CAS.
 
serghei

serghei

Senior Member
If Barcelona register Arda, it might create a conflict between FIFA and RFEF. Barcelona won't suffer more than Real Madrid, Valencia, or Atletico Madrid, since an eventual sanction from FIFA will target RFEF as an affiliate member, not only Barca. And FIFA won't sanction RFEF.

If Barto has balls, he should move on with registering Arda.
 
aaron101

aaron101

Active member
serghei said:
If Barcelona register Arda, it might create a conflict between FIFA and RFEF. Barcelona won't suffer more than Real Madrid, Valencia, or Atletico Madrid, since an eventual sanction from FIFA will target RFEF as an affiliate member, not only Barca. And FIFA won't sanction RFEF.

If Barto has balls, he should move on with registering Arda.
Click to expand...

So how can Barca register Arda if Fifa doesn't approve it? We'll have to wait until the they bring it to CAS.
 
serghei

serghei

Senior Member
aaron101 said:
So how can Barca register Arda if Fifa doesn't approve it? We'll have to wait until the they bring it to CAS.
Click to expand...

Fifa will have to approve it because they have no reason why they wouldn't. If it's legal for RFEF it means it's legal for FIFA as well, because RFEF is an affiliated member. If FIFA accepts RFEF as a member, it accepts it's regulations as well. If there's a conflict between the statutes, than FIFA has the right to ask for modifications, because it is the higher body. Since they didn't so far, it can only mean RFEF's rules are recognized as valid.

At least that's what I think.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Home of Barca Fans

Top