M
Malappapper
Guest
If we kept RVP things would have been very different. It proves that we should have splashed BIG money on a world class striker, to replace a world class striker we just lost. 40 or 50mil for Falcao + 150k per week, just to jog in the same place, barely replacing RVP instead of giving him what he wanted. Why did we allow Nasri's contract situation to get to that point? Everything has gotten much worse since Gazidis was brought in to supposedly turn us around. The only ones laughing now are the board, who made millions from the sales of Cesc/Nasri/RVP.
All they are interested in is getting 4th place to jog in the same place every year. Keep that money rolling and keep their pockets filled. Meanwhile we win nothing and more players get fed up and leave. Like I said before, getting 5th place might be a blessing in disguise. A wake-up call to get our shit together.
It is you the Arsenal fans who are to blame.
The Arsenal board and stockholders are nothing but capitalists looking for profit. Their interest lie in keeping costs down, while revenues are maximized. This mean expensive matchday tickets, expensive merchandise that can be sold all over the globe thanks to EPL popularity. Finding good sponsors, like Nike and Emirates, and of course getting that crucial 3rd/4th place that gets you the extra CL cash, and also maintains you (even barely) in the European elite. If they can also get Wenger to locate and nurture talent and then sell for profit (Persie, Cesc, Nasri, Adebayor) well that makes things even better.
Now, it is a fact that City and Chelsea have oil money with which you cannot compete, and United are around 20% (maybe a bit more) richer than you. But if the club was at the hands of someone who cared only about the results of Arsenal FC, then the club would not be looking to make any profits at all. It's not as if you are an industrial enterprise that wants profits to re-invest in equipment and technology. You are a football club, that would have had little problem in running even small losses (nothing wrong with that) in order to remain as competitive as possible.
If I were the collective mind of the Arsenal crowd, I would have simply boycotted the games (all games) until the board makes a pledge to just break even, and re-invest all profit into buying players.
There is no other way.
If I were an Arsenal stockholder, I would be vary happy now with the value of my shares plus the dividends.
*I even remember reading somewhere the comments of one Arsenal bigwig (do not remember who) that claimed that even if Arsenal were to lose out on CL qualification, their business model would still be sound. That means, that the number crunchers at Arsenal are calculating that it is more financially wise, to risk a 5th/6th place finish, than spend on players. Tells you all you need to know really about the logic of shareholders controlling a football club.
Last edited: