barcafan161
Active member
He could have killed someone.
But he didn't or even hurt anybody else.
He could have killed someone.
It doesn't make reckless driving and/or driving under the influence less bad or dangerous just because he didn't injure or kill someone though, he got lucky on that part. It's not like he could control the accident in a manner to be 100% sure that no one would be hurt. So I don't understand why some people are sticking up for him because of that.
His apology seemed very sincere though, have to give him that much.
A blood alcohol level of 1.2 is really not that much at all like I said previously. Two glasses of wine with dinner could achieve that. Last night I had a patient at 4.5 and he was walking around without assistance however slurring his words- should the person be driving, hell no...but he also had almost 4x the alcohol level Vidal did.
If I were Vidal I wouldn't take the chance given his lifestyle as a footballer and basically his life of luxury.
A lot of judgemental people here, some saints supposedly. Never drank, even a beer or two, and drove before? The halo is beaming ever so brightly.
Alcohol destroys people's lives, maybe if you had a personal experience with alcohol related tragedy you would understand what people are trying to say here.
Employing personal anecdotes to justify making inane judgements upon others mistakes seems ethnically shallow in itself.
Failing to kill someone undoubtedly makes it "less bad". You don't even know whether he were impaired to the point where it caused the accident, only that his blood alcohol level was slightly above the legal limit, which says almost nothing about his person in the context of morals and ethics.
Failing to kill someone undoubtedly makes it "less bad". You don't even know whether he were impaired to the point where it caused the accident, only that his blood alcohol level was slightly above the legal limit, which says almost nothing about his person in the context of morals and ethics.
Employing personal anecdotes to justify making inane judgements upon others mistakes seems ethnically shallow in itself.
But you can't blame people who have lost a friend or family member in a drunk driving accident for feeling more strongly about such things than people who haven't.
I don't think so.
you mean ethically right ? I don't think the judgement is inane. The social costs of alcohol consumption clearly outweigh the social benefits, but I digress. I was simply trying to get him to see things from the perspective of others