Because he's too slow to form the starting CB-partnership with either Pique or Bartra?why would we not go for hummels?
Because he's too slow to form the starting CB-partnership with either Pique or Bartra?why would we not go for hummels?
What do you guys think about Fabian Schar?
Neither Silva nor Vidic played for a top league & they were actually a lot order when they were recruited by Milan & MUTD. The same could be said of Neymar & Suarez before they came to Barca & Liverpool; so top league experience should matter little IMO.I was wondering about him to. Can't say I've ever seen him play though. But as he hasn't played in a top league it might be a risk. Think we might need someone tried and tested in a top league.
What do you guys think about Fabian Schar?
Mathieu is better than Schär.
Don't worry, marquinhos is still not for sale according to PSG and french medias.
So no shitty marquinhos, rejoyce!
Just a question if you could choose between marquinhos or bartra who would you pick ?If I have A choice Marquinhos or nobody/Mathieu/Vertonghen/etc. I would choose Marquinhos. Still better than Mathieu for 20 mln €.
You keep on believing the PSG board for all you like. Like i said to you before, PSG is playing hard ball, and if a club comes in with an offer too good to turn down, they will accept it. Club presidents etc will say X player is not for sale, because they will want to see what offers are laid down in front of them.