i_bleed_blaugrana
Senior Member
Firstly, there is not need to come at people with that aggressive and condescending tone. No one here is a master football tactician nor genius football mind, so there's no need to shoot down others ideas with such venom just because you disagree with them.
Secondly, wasn't me who said the "eat Atletico Madird alive", I was just commenting on the formation. That formation btw, is a good plan B formation to counter bus parking. Bus-parking teams won't hit you from the wings, but from the center with long balls to CF and from counters. Playing 3 CBs along with Busquets through the middle gives you more security against counters from the bus, and allows the rest of your players to devote themselves entirely to offense.
Obviously against normal offensive sides that formation won't work as well because it's true they'll exploit the wings, but I don't think the original poster was suggesting this formation become the standard formation, but merely giving a plan B type to counter defensive sides.
Thank you.
I think this, a double-pivot system for more offensive teams and our false 9 4-3-3 should all be formations we should become comfortable with. 3-5-2 for bus teams (Atletico, Chelsea etc.), double pivot for more dangerous teams (City, Liverpool) and our normal 4-3-3 when we have a clear advantage.
But for the 4-3-3 in particular, I want a real striker who can interchange with Messi on the right side. Thats the key, the striker needs to be able to beat markers and score from the right too. That's why a Mandzukic type striker really won't work. I liked him at first but after seeing what he did against Madrid, a mobile, strong, dynamic player like Aguero (and what Eto'o was) is whats needed.